佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

楼主: kaiyet

法律系FAQ

    [复制链接]
发表于 30-10-2012 05:23 PM | 显示全部楼层
唔留手 发表于 26-10-2012 08:32 AM
公務員的話,可去申請PDRM/SPRM/JKTM/JIM等工作。
私立業界就去律師樓打工,也可當大學預科班的法 ...


老師和講師有分別嗎?

回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 30-10-2012 05:31 PM | 显示全部楼层
bestliverpool 发表于 26-10-2012 10:50 AM
请问一下有没有人可以解释一下沙巴自从加入马来亚之后的司法体制?据我所知,我们沙巴的司法体制好像有点差 ...

感覺你們東馬的司法制度很黑暗

Murder Suspect walks free
http://www.theborneopost.com/201 ... suspect-walks-free/

是什麼樣的人可以如此冷血,放過這種禽獸?簡直下流無恥到了極點,雜碎都不如。



回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-10-2012 07:46 PM | 显示全部楼层
skyssz 发表于 30-10-2012 04:23 PM
请问一下如何申请进入SPRM工作?我看了他们的网站没有写.

他們不是每個月聘請員工的,又不是超級市場。
老師教中學的,譬如學院裡的大學預科班,有學士學位資格就應付得來了。
講師教學士學位課程的,至少要有碩士學位資格。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-10-2012 10:47 PM | 显示全部楼层
木木彡 发表于 25-10-2012 09:05 PM
其实negligence是不是可以算是civil同时也是criminal offence?
是不是前者只需要prove 那个4 element(du ...

negligence 完全没有关系到Criminal,因为没有mens rea,当然,如果是醉酒驾驶或超速意外就另当别论,但这些都属于traffic offence,刑法不会很高,最多吊销执照而已,而omission也不是这样用的。见死不救算是omission,但并不构成任何罪行,除非是你自愿扛起那个责任,比如你把一个流浪汉带回家,但却不给他吃东西,这样就是criminal law 的omission.

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 1-11-2012 09:25 AM | 显示全部楼层
迷茫羔羊 发表于 31-10-2012 10:47 PM
negligence 完全没有关系到Criminal,因为没有mens rea,当然,如果是醉酒驾驶或超速意外就另当别论,但这 ...

negligence 是会出现在criminal里面的哦..gross negli manslaughter...

omission跟AR放在一起是因为AR 是req +ve act. 如果一个人没有+ve act的话,你才找看omission有没有关联。omission 基本上只是要记得一点:defendant有没有duty to act??? 如果他应该要有+ve act的可是他并没有act的话aka failure to act,那个就是omission了。如果他有omission+因为omission造成严重的后果就成立~

关于那个road case如果人死翘翘了, 绝对是criminal offense. 如果受伤的话就通常是tort因为要申请赔偿...




回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 1-11-2012 09:35 AM | 显示全部楼层
老娘一把年纪还要赶交作业。。。。 Halloween Party刚趴完还要做land跟juris....... 要爆肝料......
回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
发表于 2-11-2012 02:36 PM | 显示全部楼层
ruri3 发表于 1-11-2012 09:25 AM
negligence 是会出现在criminal里面的哦..gross negli manslaughter...

omission跟AR放在一起是因为A ...

不愧是乳粒姐啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊很強大啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-11-2012 02:37 PM | 显示全部楼层

RE: 法律系FAQ

ruri3 发表于 1-11-2012 09:35 AM
老娘一把年纪还要赶交作业。。。。 Halloween Party刚趴完还要做land跟juris....... 要爆肝料......

可以的啦,你醬強
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 2-11-2012 08:44 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeremykkt 发表于 2-11-2012 02:36 PM
不愧是乳粒姐啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊很強大啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊

其实真的记得不是很清楚了... 好久以前的事情料... 就agak agak~


叹气·... 今年还是一样懒惰.... 怎么办????
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-11-2012 10:08 PM | 显示全部楼层
ruri3 发表于 2-11-2012 08:44 PM
其实真的记得不是很清楚了... 好久以前的事情料... 就agak agak~

可以的啦~~~~大不了拿不到4 flat 罷了嗎~
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 3-11-2012 12:42 AM | 显示全部楼层
ruri3 发表于 1-11-2012 09:25 AM
negligence 是会出现在criminal里面的哦..gross negli manslaughter...

omission跟AR放在一起是因为A ...

GrossNegligence Manslaughter 已经不算是Negligence 了,the standard for negligence iswhether a reasonable person will do such positive act or omission, while thestandard of gross negligence is whether the jury considers the act or omissionjustifies criminal conviction. For example, in R v Bennett, D had unlawfully kept in his house a quantity of fireworks, which, through thenegligence of his employees, were set on fire, and thus caused the death of thedeceased, and it was held that the accused could not be convicted ofmanslaughter,但如果在普通的tort cases,Defendant一定会liable.最重要的是,Gross Negligence Manslaughter不需要establish duty of care, breach, causation之类的,所以Negligence GrossNegligence是完全不一样的东西。

For road accident,如果D在没有犯交通规则或有intention to kill的情况下,撞死人一定不是CriminalOffence, for example,如果D没有超速,没有醉酒,只是normal在马路上行驶,但他不小心撞死了一个突然冲出马路的路人。在这种情况下,criminallaw根本没有一个offence可以对付他。受害者的家属只可以向他claim damages under law of tort.如果他醉酒驾驶然后撞死人,这样他可能会被prosecuted,但不是因为他撞死人,而是因为他犯了drunk driving的offence.

本帖最后由 迷茫羔羊 于 3-11-2012 01:10 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 3-11-2012 03:34 AM | 显示全部楼层
迷茫羔羊 发表于 3-11-2012 12:42 AM
GrossNegligence Manslaughter 已经不算是Negligence 了,the standard for negligence iswhether a reas ...

谢谢你的讲解~~

可是我以为gross negli还是negli的一种... 不过不是under tort而已...是criminal的
Gross negligence manslaughter is a form of involuntary manslaughter where the defendant is ostensibly acting lawfully. Involuntary manslaughter may arise where the defendant has caused death but neither intended to cause death nor intended to cause serious bodily harm and thus lacks the mens rea of murder.
Adomako, R v (1994) HL

[Manslaughter by gross negligence subsumes reckless manslaughter]
D, an anaesthetist, failed to observe during an eye operation that the tube inserted in V’s mouth had become detached from the ventilator, causing V to suffer a cardiac arrest and eventually die.

Held: D was guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence, which is established where D breached a duty of care towards V that caused V’s death and that amounted to gross negligence.
Lord MacKay LC:
“…gross negligence…depends…on the seriousness of the breach of the duty committed by the defendant in all the circumstances in which he was placed when it occurred and whether, having regard to the risk of death involved, the conduct of the defendant was so bad in all the circumstances as to amount in the jury’s judgment to a criminal act or omission”.
the essential ingredients of involuntary manslaughter by breach of duty:
(1) proof of the existence of the duty;
(2) breach of that duty causing death; and
(3) gross negligence which the jury considered justified a criminal conviction.


Guilty

就像我说的... criminal的negli 是只要DOC跟BOD, Causation就ok了... The defendant's conduct was so bad in all the circumstances as to amount in the jury's opinion to a crime. jury=r/sonable man啊~

你的Bennett... InR v Bennett (1858) D had unlawfully kept in his house a quantity of fireworks, which, through the negligence of his employees, were set on fire, and thus caused the death of the deceased, and it was held that the accused could not be convicted of manslaughter, it was held that D is not responsible criminally if the death was directly caused in his absence by the negligence of his employees or others.因为不是D negli所以他才不liable啊~~是他的员工negli....

那个road act的.. 他的问题是已经confirm有negli了... 他不是已经说了如果‘那个driver careless in driving所以撞死一个人’-就是已经设定有negli了啊.... 是应该列入什么charge吗? 就是已经知道有negli了的意思... 所以我将如果有人死就是criminal了... ><
本帖最后由 ruri3 于 3-11-2012 03:44 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 3-11-2012 09:57 AM | 显示全部楼层
ruri3 发表于 3-11-2012 03:34 AM
谢谢你的讲解~~

可是我以为gross negli还是negli的一种... 不过不是under tort而已...是criminal的

Adomako v R提出了三个用来establish GNM的pre-condition,分别是是DOC and Breach and jury’s perception of criminal conviction,但其实我觉得实际上只有两个pre-condition,那就是Duty和breach,而jury’s perception只是Breach的standard,在tort of negligence, the standard of care 是a reasonable man, 但GNM的standard是the breachis so gross to the extent that jury might think that it should amount to acriminal offence,所以如果用巴仙率来解释的话,如果tort的standard是80%的人不会这样做,这样GNM的standard就是90%的人不会这样做了。从Beyond reasonable doubt 和balance ofprobabilities的issue,我们就知道,to convict a person under criminal offence, the degree of  wrongful act must be higher than civil matter,所以说GrossNegligence 是negligence的升级版,就好像murder 和manlaughter的关系一样,两者都是杀人,但需要prove的element却不一样,所以我们不可以说murder = manslaughter。

如果R v Bennett是civilmatter,这样D肯定是liable的,D有duty to take care of his neighbourhood,但他却放置大量的explosive material,这已经表示他有breach,for causation, but for his storing of explosivematerial, the victim would not have been injured,for remoteness, as a reasonable man,he must be able to foresee theincident,所以在tort,他一定会输,但在criminal, the standard of breach must be higher. If we are usingthe same scenario, D can only be convicted, if he discovered the explosion, butfailed to take action to mitigate the damage,就好像有人不小心令到一间屋子起火,但却不顾而去,这样才会liable for GNM.在Bennett的judgement, judge要表示的是 当时D是没有在现场,所以也不会不顾而去,所以not liable.
Jury当然是reasonable man,但他们要做的,不是consider “whether a reasonable man would have committed it”,而是’whether a reasonable man would think that D’s negligence is so gross to the extent that it will amount to a criminal offence.

for road accident 的,the standard of careless driving in Tort and the standard of careless driving in Criminal 也是不同的。 在tort,只要被判定了有breach,比如只是简单的没有看side mirror就吃过另一条line,导致意外发生,这样在tort就是careless driving,而criminal 的carelessdriving,一定要prove: Speeding和Driving after drinking alcohol之类的,所以可能它们share一样的terminology,但standard却是不同的。

但这也是个人的见解,没有任何冒犯的意图。=)

本帖最后由 迷茫羔羊 于 3-11-2012 10:07 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 3-11-2012 11:38 AM | 显示全部楼层
迷茫羔羊 发表于 3-11-2012 09:57 AM
Adomako v R提出了三个用来establish GNM的pre-condition,分别是是DOC and Breach and jury’s percepti ...

其实好像是误会了.... 没有觉得被冒犯~


我们版友只是想要知道ommission在criminal的关联.....
其实你的答案没有错... 只是他其实要的是简单的东西而已... XD 只是立场不同看得东西也不一样~

既是 criminal是for crime, tort是civil....
你说的升级版~ 其实在名字上就知道了啊~ Gross negli啊~ 就是严重的negli嘛~~我之前也说了啊~ 要证明D的negli造成V的后果~~ (其实我们都在讲一样的东西... 只是出发的观点不同~~ )

关于bennette... D可能不会完全liable因为个人觉得employees有break of causation~ 反正他就不是tort case啊~ 没有必要想酱远啦~~

亲,我们版友其实只是要知道... 如果已经PROVEN 料那个人drive carelessly... 就是不管你做什么去鉴定... (case fact就是跟你讲他drive CARELESSLY 撞死人) 要用什么而已... 所以standard(怎样鉴定)不是答案的一部分啊... >< 大家好像误会大家的意思~...


其实重要的是... 看你在什么paper啦~~ criminal就用criminal的走~ tort用tort的就ok料~~~



本帖最后由 ruri3 于 3-11-2012 11:41 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 3-11-2012 08:08 PM | 显示全部楼层
也对pun!=)
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 11-11-2012 10:12 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeremykkt 发表于 2-11-2012 10:08 PM
可以的啦~~~~大不了拿不到4 flat 罷了嗎~

好久没到这儿了, 大家还好吧? 我们的如日姐应该不会拿4flat, 因为她好像拿超过4科。哈哈哈
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 12-11-2012 12:15 AM | 显示全部楼层
jhong 发表于 11-11-2012 10:12 PM
好久没到这儿了, 大家还好吧? 我们的如日姐应该不会拿4flat, 因为她好像拿超过4科。哈哈哈

哇,果然是能者多勞啊!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 14-11-2012 09:36 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeremykkt 发表于 12-11-2012 12:15 AM
哇,果然是能者多勞啊!!!

哪里哪里... 承让了...不过是拿个sampan kayak law... 哪里够杰瑞米哥的厉害....

尽力啦... 虽然感觉机会渺茫....
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 14-11-2012 09:56 PM | 显示全部楼层
ruri3 发表于 1-11-2012 09:35 AM
老娘一把年纪还要赶交作业。。。。 Halloween Party刚趴完还要做land跟juris....... 要爆肝料......

什莫来的?bar?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 14-11-2012 10:13 PM | 显示全部楼层
coffeemate 发表于 14-11-2012 09:56 PM
什莫来的?bar?

啊? 我还在final yr~ >.<

就是我们的optional subj啊~
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

所属分类: 欢乐校园


ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 30-12-2025 10:58 AM , Processed in 0.119544 second(s), 23 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表