Teach me

skyong73

Do you know as follow :-

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has ruled as “unconstitutional” the sentencing of a  teenager who is being held at the pleasure of the King after he was convicted of murdering his tuition teacher's daughter five years ago.

In a landmark decision yesterday read out by Justice Gopal Sri Ram, the court ruled that Section 97 (2), which allows a juvenile to be held at the pleasure of the King, was unconstitutional.

The two other judges on the Bench, which heard the boy's appeal against conviction and sentence, were Justice Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin and Justice Raus Sharif.

The Bench was unanimous in ruling that the power to determine the punishment against a child convicted of murder, in lieu of a death punishment, was vested in the hands of the judiciary and not the executive.

Justice Sri Ram, in his 18-page judgment, said Section 97 (2) of the Child Act violated the doctrine of separation of powers, by consigning to the executive the judicial power to determine the measure of the sentence to be served by a juvenile offender.

He said the doctrine of separation of powers was an integral part of the Federal Constitution and since Article 4 (1) of the Federal Constitution declared the Constitution to be the supreme law, any state action violating the doctrine of separation of powers must be struck down as unconstitutional.

有誰明白紅字是什么意思.

謝謝

MHW7784

The two other judges on the Bench, which heard the boy's appeal against conviction and sentence, were Justice Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin and Justice Raus Sharif.

其他两个聆听这个boy的上诉是Justice Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin and Justice Raus Sharif.

The Bench was unanimous in ruling that the power to determine the punishment against a child convicted of murder, in lieu of a death punishment, was vested in the hands of the judiciary and not the executive.
法官们一致通过， 这个小孩谋杀罪刑，是由司法judiciary来决定， 不是executive （意指YDPA)

He said the doctrine of separation of powers was an integral part of the Federal Constitution and since Article 4 (1) of the Federal Constitution declared the Constitution to be the supreme law, any state action violating the doctrine of separation of powers must be struck down as unconstitutional.

他说separation of powers 是联邦宪法的一部分， Article 4 (1) 也有说联邦宪法是至高无上的。 所以所有违反doctrine of separation of powers的行动，就是违反联邦宪法

意思大概就是这样。。。 7 年后的回复，希望不会太迟

batman69

盤古成仙了。。。。。

MHW7784

R I p :dizzy: