禁阿拉字眼，教会挑战被驳回，为何这么极端？在外国都被当成成恐怖分子了

winray

婆罗洲基督教会（SIB）挑战內政部禁止入口含有「阿拉」字眼基督教书籍的决定不成，因高庭今日驳回婆罗洲基督教会要求司法审核的准令申请。               

高庭法官拿督查丽哈裁决，基于上诉庭已裁决「阿拉」字眼並非基督教信仰中不可或缺的部分，因此高庭今日驳回婆罗洲基督教会的准令申请。

法官查丽哈的判词由高庭助理主簿官阿伦读出。法官说，高庭別无选择，必须参照上诉庭在天主教先锋报使用「阿拉」字眼上诉一案所做出的裁决。

「所以，虽然上诉庭的裁决是针对天主教先锋报，但承审的所有上诉庭法官皆认为，『阿拉』不是基督教信仰不可或缺的一部分。因此，內政部禁止入口含有『阿拉』字眼的基督教书籍，並没有违宪。」

http://www.orientaldaily.com.my/ ... =115074:&Itemid=113

為什麼要這麼的極端呢？怪不得在外國你們都被當成恐怖瘋子。

阿杜

dupont378

木丝林兄弟会  和 教会  是一伙 在演戏。。

Pay attention to this signal when you're watching television. Freemasons live under a sword to keep their mouths shut about what they know and what they do in their Lodge rituals. Subtle secret handshakes, which are difficult for the goyim to pick up on, are one of the ways Freemasons identify each other in public, often right under the noses of the uninitiated.

“Accredited diviners, both male and female, have always secret spies, who instruct them as to the private life or habits of those who consult them. A code of signals is established between cabinet and antechamber; an unknown applicant receives a number at his first visit; a day is arranged, and he is followed; door-keepers, neighbours, servants are engaged in gossip, and details are thus arrived at which overwhelm simple minds, leading them to invest an impostor with the reverence which should be reserved for true science and genuine divination.” - The Doctrine of Transcendental Magic (1896), PART II: page 122-3

VATICAN II Secretary of State “Cardinal” Tarcisio Bertone demonstrates the Freemason Handshake.

Muslim Brotherhood & Vatican
Condemn UN Efforts to Eliminate Violence Against Women

Alex Hamasaki, Student Intern
Last Modified: 02:37 a.m. DST, 19 March 2013


EGYPT – The battle between cultural and universal human rights has resurfaced at the United Nations.
The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) held their 57th conference from March 4 – 15th
to approve the declaration that would work toward the elimination of violence against women and children.
The declaration passed on March 15, despite the objections from the Muslim Brotherhood, conservative Muslim countries, and the Vatican. The text of the declaration has not yet been published.
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood criticized the document, claiming it was “deceitful” and clashed with Islamic principles about family, community, and Islamic societies. Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Libya, Nigeria, Sudan, Honduras, and the Vatican, though having expressed reservations about the declaration, did not block the adoption of the declaration.
CSW was established in 1946 for the advancement of women and gender equality. The declaration is non-binding, however, Aljazeera reports that diplomats and rights activists say that the declaration carries “enough global weight to pressure countries to improve the lives of women and girls.”
Prior to the passing of the declaration, a participant in the negotiations said that Egypt will seek out an opt-out clause, which would allow countries to implement the declaration according to their own traditions. However, Egypt’s motion failed, several countries saying that this clause would undermine the entire document.
According to the Muslim Brotherhood, the declaration is destructive to the institutions of family and community, and that the declaration calls for the return for the early Jahiliyyah. Jahiliyyah is the Islamic concept of “the state of ignorance of the guidance from God,” referring to the time period prior to the revelation of the Quran to Muhammad.
The Brotherhood also decried the declaration’s defense of homosexual rights, declaration of equality in inheritance, the use of contraception and abortion under the name of sexual and reproductive rights, and to cancel the obligatory authorization of the husband in travel, work, going out, or use of contraceptive.
The Muslim Brotherhood is one of the largest political forces in Egypt, and the group won Egypt’s presidency and controls the parliament. Its credo is, “God is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader, Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.”
The Brotherhood calls upon rulers of Islamic countries, their Foreign ministers, and their representatives in the UN to reject the declaration. Further, according to the translation of the Arabic statement by Jee Paules, the Muslim Brotherhood “call for women’s organizations to adhere to their religion and the morals of their communities and the elements of our social life and not to be seduced by the deceptive, misleading and destructive calls for urbanization.”
The Associated Press said that even Libya’s top cleric raised similar concerns, saying that the document violates Islamic teachings.
However, according to Aljazeera, Egypt’s delegation said “it would not stand in the way of the declaration for the sake of women’s empowerment.”
The duality between universal and cultural human rights has been long debated. Cultural relativism asserts that human values are far from universal, and vary according to cultural perspectives. Groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood argue that human rights are culturally relative and should be subject to State discretion rather than international legal imperative. If the UN were to take the cultural relativism as their stance, States could then use this as a way to declare that their cultural norms were above international law.
Universal human rights suggest that regardless of culture, that there is a baseline of rights assumed for every human being. However, what is considered “universal rights” are constantly changing. Ultimately, the continuation of the fight for finding a medium between universal and cultural rights over time will allow for the opening of avenues for human rights in the international arena.
Follow Alex Hamasaki on TwitterTwitter: @nahmias_report
Student Intern: @aghamasaki

lhk1883

其实上帝看到有人因为他叫什么名字而限制使用会不会觉得很好笑？吵这么多，如果他叫ah beng全部人嘛叫错了？？？

bashlyner

请将心比心，如果有人一直叫你的孩子做那鸡，叫你的女儿做河马，你会高兴吗？要别人尊重你，请先尊重别人

winray

bashlyner 发表于 5-5-2014 11:44 PM
请将心比心，如果有人一直叫你的孩子做那鸡，叫你的女儿做河马，你会高兴吗？要别人尊重你，请先尊重别人

这不过是一个字眼也要这样极端的阻止他们使用，想不透。