Tropicana Bay Residences @Penang World City

小小菌

surevin 发表于 10-10-2018 01:41 PM
大家有觉得TBR水质如何？ 自从搬进来以后头发明显掉得多， 现在怀疑是水质，硬水，，，，

早上开水直接煮来喝会有点味道。开了水侯要流了一下就没有味道了。

小小菌

caoyun 发表于 24-9-2018 03:52 PM
我到现在还没有收到 management 的信, 幸好还是 group 里面通知的， 为什么那么迟还收不到通知。。嘿嘿。。。

嗯.. proposed 什么不太重要, 现在希望能选到是能代表我们发言的人变成主席, 不然就是一言堂了.   ...

这次last min 不能出席，下轮会尽量出席了。

小小菌

miaw87 发表于 23-9-2018 10:16 PM
first annual general meeting在 6 oct。。。

我想要propose 不要charge 钱在facility 了。。。不然只能看不能用。。。

嗯，好多都用不到。

小小菌

miaw87 发表于 23-9-2018 10:32 PM
请问大家用什么过滤器？因为屋子太小了，希望可以用便宜小架和不用电的

还找着呢……水侯款式难安装。

caoyun

小小菌 发表于 22-10-2018 01:23 AM
这次last min 不能出席，下轮会尽量出席了。

呵呵。。 我第一次出席。。 觉得很新奇。。
还有 buffet 吃。。

caoyun

suyy10 发表于 18-10-2018 11:33 AM
少过

的确很差。。
可能要等 stable 好后。。价钱才叫好。。现在还有很多空的单位。

小小菌

今天才看到会议报告，管理换人，对住户会有影响吗？

miaw87

有谁想打badminton吗？搬进去酱久都还没有用过设施。。。

小小菌

miaw87 发表于 11-12-2018 09:44 PM
有谁想打badminton吗？搬进去酱久都还没有用过设施。。。

去看你打可以吗？

miaw87

小小菌 发表于 14-12-2018 12:01 AM
去看你打可以吗？

一起打啦 。。。我是菜鸟罢了。。。

Janlim

miaw87 发表于 15-12-2018 12:11 PM
一起打啦 。。。我是菜鸟罢了。。。

我可以哈哈。

Janlim

caoyun 发表于 22-10-2018 02:58 PM
的确很差。。
可能要等 stable 好后。。价钱才叫好。。现在还有很多空的单位。

我朋友fully furnish 872sqft 2200. Expat jp

Janlim

caoyun 发表于 22-10-2018 02:55 PM
呵呵。。 我第一次出席。。 觉得很新奇。。
还有 buffet 吃。。

有东西吃？sai jor没去lol

miaw87

Janlim 发表于 31-12-2018 05:37 PM
我可以哈哈。

lets go

假如badminton court免费的就好啦。。。

Janlim

miaw87 发表于 31-12-2018 05:48 PM
lets go

假如badminton court免费的就好啦。。。

凑够4个才可以打吧哈哈还缺二lol

miaw87

Janlim 发表于 31-12-2018 06:00 PM
凑够4个才可以打吧哈哈还缺二lol

来吧。。。谁还要打球： 男女都可以

1。Janlim
2。miaw87

miaw87

在penang property talk看到这个：

One of the ex-visitor car park ended up with at least one senior member of committee members.

One owner brought up the matter of 8 ex-visitors car park already labelled as such were subsequently converted into private car parks during recent AGM but Mr Ho was quiet and now we know where did they go to.

This is at least an immoral gain by recipients. The car parks belong to ALL Owners as they were intended to be so. The developer should not have profited them in the 1st place. Even if the developer chooses to do so, the car parks should be opened to all and subject to proper evaluation to justify who are the owners they should be sold to. In any way, I failed to see why they should profit from this at the cost of ALL OWNERS?

Can the senior committee member justify this?

While we criticize our brother Jho Low for his misconduct in IMDB and how sucks is our developer, are we looking at similar behind the scenes act by some or all committee members too (who were very active and handed out piece of paper asking owners’ to withhold stakeholders’ funds)?

How many generation of committee members are needed to make things straight all over Malaysia?

想知道到底发生了什么事？committee找好处？？

Janlim

miaw87 发表于 31-12-2018 06:36 PM
在penang property talk看到这个：

One of the ex-visitor car park ended up with at least one senior member of committee members.

One owner brought up the matter of 8 ex-visitors car park already l ...

Commitee有没有好处自己断定，那么多vendor. Security la insurance la. 漏洞肯定有的。这个case是developer 静静卖visitor car park给Committee. 那么visitor carpark 就变少了。

caoyun

小小菌 发表于 5-12-2018 12:17 AM
今天才看到会议报告，管理换人，对住户会有影响吗？

换了再看看吧。。希望能更进步。。

caoyun

miaw87 发表于 31-12-2018 06:36 PM
在penang property talk看到这个：

One of the ex-visitor car park ended up with at least one senior member of committee members.

One owner brought up the matter of 8 ex-visitors car park already l ...

我在 group chat 里面反而没有看到有人挑战这个题目。。 毕竟我们的  committee 是大家投出来的。
如果真的有实际的证据。。 我想在 group 里面应该会被炒上天啊。。

group 里面是实际名字的。。 我觉得比较有说服力。