车被偷了。

做一尾快乐的鱼

我的是wira在old klang road 的sri manja court 外面的路边不见的。
ecor 发表于 10-12-2011 11:29 PM

    那现在怎样了？保险赔了吗？

做一尾快乐的鱼

他就什么都不做哦？
hiromilady 发表于 10-12-2011 12:32 PM

正常的啦。我不怪那外劳，我恨死偷我的车的印度水。

做一尾快乐的鱼

他就什么都不做哦？
hiromilady 发表于 10-12-2011 12:32 PM

    我不讨厌那外劳，我恨死那偷我的车的印度水。

yfx

回复  slummble


    Plaza OUG，华联广场，在sri petaling附近的。以前的yaohan
做一尾快乐的鱼 发表于 8-12-2011 10:11 PM

   那边很多车泊在外面的。

dolby-digital

车牌是什么，请加上，方便寻找

小虫

虽说是Park at your own risks，不过car park管理层方面如果没有做好完善的保安措施也应该负起责任吧。

舞猫猫

看来很多人车子被偷 =.=||

做一尾快乐的鱼

那边很多车泊在外面的。
yfx 发表于 12-12-2011 08:48 AM

    本来我们也是打算泊外面的，那天下雨。

做一尾快乐的鱼

回复 45# dolby-digital


    WNT 8235

yfx

本来我们也是打算泊外面的，那天下雨。
做一尾快乐的鱼 发表于 12-12-2011 09:07 PM

   下次我也不敢泊在里面了！

ecor

那现在怎样了？保险赔了吗？
做一尾快乐的鱼 发表于 12-12-2011 08:16 AM

保险没有那么快会赔咯。。保险那边说要等警察出surat keputusan才会开始做赔偿，我也不清楚警察什么时候才会出surat keputusan.我的车是wira 深灰色，车牌WJF1229有看到的话麻烦报警~谢了~

wuyaya

我以为现在没人要偷kancil鸟；恐怖勒

dolby-digital

回复 49# 做一尾快乐的鱼


    帮你留意在fb

做一尾快乐的鱼

我以为现在没人要偷kancil鸟；恐怖勒
wuyaya 发表于 12-12-2011 10:10 PM

    哎呀，什么鬼都有人要偷的啦，看谁倒霉而已。这就是我们“先进”的码莱希压。

做一尾快乐的鱼

回复 51# ecor


    是咯，我的保险ejen说最快也要半年才会陪。那死偷车贼害我无端端不见几十千

wuyaya

哎呀，什么鬼都有人要偷的啦，看谁倒霉而已。这就是我们“先进”的码莱希压。
做一尾快乐的鱼 发表于 13-12-2011 12:23 PM

嘿...没办法咯以后什么事都要谨慎些

woodtock

广场这样大,CCTV都没有,差到..
KANCIL也要几十千啊??

Hope18

法庭曾经判泊车业主需付上责任！！！！

‘Park at own risk’ sign no shield from liability
(The Star 25/4/2009)

GEORGE TOWN: A “Park at your own risk” sign does not excuse an operator from being liable for items stolen from cars parked in the area under his care.

Yesterday, a magistrates court here ordered a car park operator to pay lawyer John Heah Wee Theng RM1,668 for items stolen from his car parked at an open air car park near Komtar two years ago.

The items included a compact disc and cassette player with a CD of a compilation of Neil Diamond’s songs, an amplifier, and a pair of Ray-Ban sunglasses.

In his statement of claim filed against Timur Car Park Sdn Bhd, Heah said the notice board at the entrance to the car park stating that the defendant was not responsible for any loss or damage did not absolve the defendant from its duty of care and from liability.

In its defence, Timur Car Park argued that the notice board at the entrance meant Heah had clear knowledge that he was parking his car at his own risk.

The company added that it only provided a parking facility for the public and not a security service to prevent theft or trespass, and did not have duty of care.

It said Heah could have failed to lock his car and activate the alarm system, or failed to ensure that the alarm system and the locks of the car doors were all functioning well.

Heah said he parked his Kenari at the former open air car park next to the Traders Hotel at about 8.30pm on Oct 20, 2007.

When he returned to his car at about 9.40pm, he found the door on the driver’s side unlocked and the items missing.

He said he paid RM2.40 to the company as parking charges for the duration, and the company had a duty of care to watch over the vehicles parked in the car park.

Heah said he parked in a bright spot near a lamppost, adding that there were only 50 to 60 cars there at the time when the car park had a capacity for about 250 to 300 cars. He also said one or two of the car park’s workers were patrolling the area on motorcycle.

Magistrate Mohamed Aznin Mohamed Ariff allowed Heah’s claim for the sum, with interest and costs.

Heah was represented by Tan Beng Hong while Su Tiam Leong appeared for Timur Car Park.

In October 2007, the car park ceased operations and piling works began at the site for the construction of the 11-storey 1st Avenue Penang shopping complex which is scheduled for completion later this year.

五花肉之光

如果有得陪，那些shopping centre 的不是claim 到乱?
收钱是=租地方park 罢了

deadman

請問賠償是怎樣算？ 你的車陪多少錢？