E Excel - 丞燕产品与事业讨论区 - AJL93303 (Extra Excel)

Billy

原帖由 MarcusTan 于 22-7-2007 10:22 PM 发表


我是IPOh的，但是参加KL的班。。
我的是PENANG线来的哦。。
你上线是谁？ 文怀？
你们是在PEARL VIEW吗？
对啊，的确学了很多东西啊。。
不过唱了三首歌。。哈哈。。
我是成功者

最大上线就是文怀。。。
我的上上线在kl的

Billy

原帖由 曼联资本 于 24-7-2007 04:40 PM 发表
使用活氧精萃後，取適量均勻塗抹全臉與頸部，早晚適用。如果你的 T 字部位比較油膩，其他部位卻很乾燥，您可以在T字部位使用活膚輕質乳霜，接著在比較乾燥的部位使用凝時潤澤乳霜。

博士说过产品是可以搭配使 ...

难得是丞燕伙伴又是曼联球迷

MarcusTan

原帖由 Billy 于 24-7-2007 06:38 PM 发表

最大上线就是文怀。。。
我的上上线在kl的

哦，原来是文怀。。
我也是啊。。
那天挑战班他也是其中一个讲师。。

不懂你认识福祥和燕美吗？

Billy

原帖由 MarcusTan 于 24-7-2007 07:13 PM 发表


哦，原来是文怀。。
我也是啊。。
那天挑战班他也是其中一个讲师。。

不懂你认识福祥和燕美吗？

当然认识啦。。
我的旁线
你是他们的朋友 ？

mokmok07

我本身很support这product。非常有效。

Billy

原帖由 mokmok07 于 3-8-2007 07:19 PM 发表
我本身很support这product。非常有效。

哈哈。。。那就要继续吃咯！

mokmok07

E－Excel已是我们家的日常必须品了，我从小就吃到大。因为我家每月平均都买2-3000以上所以我妈妈的朋友就劝我妈进member因为有member price.

MarcusTan

原帖由 Billy 于 30-7-2007 01:47 AM 发表

当然认识啦。。
我的旁线
你是他们的朋友 ？

福祥是我女友的哥哥。。
燕美是我女友的表姐。。
丞燕家族。。

Billy

原帖由 mokmok07 于 4-8-2007 08:01 PM 发表
E－Excel已是我们家的日常必须品了，我从小就吃到大。因为我家每月平均都买2-3000以上所以我妈妈的朋友就劝我妈进member因为有member price.

对啊。。。有会员价
你目前也在从事丞燕事业吗 ？

原帖由 MarcusTan 于 5-8-2007 12:38 AM 发表

福祥是我女友的哥哥。。
燕美是我女友的表姐。。
丞燕家族。。

有机会要认识你了，昨天挑战班才跟福祥，燕美聊天来

mokmok07

不是的，目前在读书快要毕业了，想过要去妈妈kindergarten去帮忙或去爸爸的工厂做工。有考率过要从事丞燕事业，因为我父母都是生易人，交流很广可能毕业后会用1or2年来进丞燕来吸取experience先，在去帮我父母做生易。

yyhhcc

原帖由 Billy 于 5-8-2007 12:09 PM 发表

对啊。。。有会员价
你目前也在从事丞燕事业吗 ？

有机会要认识你了，昨天挑战班才跟福祥，燕美聊天来

会员价好像没什么特别..如果你不是会员但如果你的朋友是会员,或介绍你吃EE 的是会员,你也间接拿到会员价,不是吗?

梦想之追求者

http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/QHr ... tional%2C%20Inc.htm

August 8, 2000
WARNING LETTER
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Jau-Fei Chen, President
E. Excel International, Inc.
1198 N Spring Creek Pl
Springville, UT 84663

Ref. No. Ref #: DEN-00-30

Dear Ms Chen:

This letter is written in reference to the marketing of various products by your firm. These products are marketed and promoted through several types of media including your magazine, "The Excellent Word." This magazine is labeling and includes statements or suggestions that several products, identified below, may be useful for treating various diseases. Disease claims in "The Excellent Word" cause these products to be drugs. Additionally, several products that your firm markets as foods are discussed in this letter.

Products that are drugs and their associated disease claims are:

Millennium Fine Cactus Nectar:
    fighting tumor growth, Epstein Barr Virus, treatment of diabetes.
Duet Ginseng and Cactus Nectar:
    cytotoxic activity against leukemia cells, anticonvulsant, antipyretic, antipsychotic, ulcer protection, Alzheimer's disease, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, central nervous system diseases, liver disease, and blood and hematopoietic system diseases.
Vision Noco Daily Nutrition Pack:
    reduced immune function, inflammation, degenerative diseases such as arthritis.
Nutrifresh and Nutriall:
    osteoporosis, lower cholesterol and therefore reduce the risk of heart disease, anticarcinogenic, cancer, discourages the growth of breast, colon, lung, leukemia, and prostate cancer cells.

Because your labeling includes statements which represent or suggest that these products are intended to be used in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, these products are drugs under Section 201(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act).

We are unaware of any evidence that establishes that these drugs are generally recognized as safe and effective for their intended uses. Therefore, these products are new drugs as described in Section 201(p) of the Act which may not be marketed since no new drug application required by Section 505 of the Act has been approved for any of these drugs.

These drugs are also misbranded under Section 502(a) of the Act because their labeling is false and misleading since it suggests that these drugs are safe and effective for their intended uses, when, in fact, this has not been established. These drugs are further misbranded under Section 502(f)(1) of the Act because their labeling fails to bear adequate directions for their intended uses.

As I have stated, the above products (Millennium Fine Cactus Nectar, Duet Ginseng & Cactus Nectar Vision Noco Dailv Nutrition Pack, Nutrifresh, and Nutriall) are drugs as currently labeled. If the drug claims for these products are eliminated, the products then become dietary supplements or foods along with the remaining products cited in this letter. The following deficiencies apply, and should be corrected:

Your Nutrifresh product (Original, Peach, Chocolate, Strawberry, and Mixed Fruit) is misbranded under Section 403(r)(1)(A) of the Act, in that its label may not contain nutrient content claims that are not authorized for use. .For example, this product bears the unauthorized nutrient content claim "Rich in Phytonutrients," for which there is no established daily value.

Your products Nutriall Health Drink, Nutrifresh, Refresh. Triflora, and EverNew are misbranded under Section 403(i)(1) of the Act in that the labels fail to bear a statement of identity by common or usual name or an appropriately descriptive term, as required by Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 101.3(b) [21 CFR 101.3(b)]. The products are dry powders, and should include a term such as "mix" to describe the nature of the products. Millennium Fine Cactus Nectar and Duet Ginseng & Cactus Nectar are also misbranded under Section 403(i)(1) of the Act in that their labels fail to bear a statement of identity by common or usual name, or an appropriately descriptive term, as required by 21 CFR 101.3(b).

Your products labeled as dietary supplements are misbranded under Sections 403(q)(5)(F) and 403(s)(2)(A) of the Act, in that their labels do not list in the supplement facts box the identity and quantity of each dietary ingredient used in the products, as required by 21 CFR 101.36. Your products ST, Concenergy, Dona-Ouai, Circle, Art, Act, Pearl, Vision, Ji-Lin Ginseng, DI, Noco, and WL identify one or more herbal dietary ingredients in the ingredient statement, but do not list the identity and quantity of each dietary ingredient in the supplement facts box.

Your products which contain botanical or herbal dietary ingredients or extracts of an herb or botanical are misbranded under Section 403(s)(2)(C) of the Act, in that their labels do not identify the part of the plant from which the dietary ingredients are derived, as required by 21 CFR 101.36. For example, your products ST, Concenergy, Dong-Ouai, Circle, Art, Act, Pearl, Vision, Ji-Lin Ginseng, DI, Noco, and WL are labeled as containing botanical or herbal dietary ingredients or extracts of an herb, but the product labels do not identify the part of the plant as required by the regulation.

Your product Noco is misbranded under section 403(i) of the Act, in that the label must list the each herb or botanical ingredient by its common or usual name, as required by 21 CFR 101.4(h). The ingredient statement on the label for Noco does not list the common or usual name for the ingredient "Jin-Jie."

Your products Millennium Fine Cactus Nectar and Duet Ginseng & Cactus Nectar are misbranded under Section 403(i)(2) of the Act, in that the products are fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label on the outside container does not bear the common or usual name of each ingredient. The ingredients are either missing or are not easily read by ordinary individuals under customary conditions of purchase and use.

Your product, Stevia, is labeled with directions for use that include the statement "dietary supplement."

   1. If this product is intended to be a dietary supplement, 21 CFR 101.3(g) requires that the label bear the statement "dietary supplement", or alternatively, "Stevia Supplement," as part of the identity statement. In addition, 21 CFR 101.36(e) requires that the label contain "Supplement Facts."
   2. If this product is not intended to be a dietary supplement, but a conventional food, 21 CFR Part 170 requires that the product be generally recognized as safe for its intended use, or used in accordance with the provisions of an authorizing regulation under 21 CFR Part 171, which describes safe use conditions. In addition, regulations require that appropriate Nutrition Facts information be included on the labeling.
   3. If this product is intended to be a cosmetic as defined in Section 201(i) of the Act, then appropriate regulations for cosmetics should be followed.

The vignette on the labels of your Nutrifresh (Original, Peach, Chocolate, Strawberry, and Mixed Fruit) products depicts a variety of fruits, some of which are not ingredients in each of these products. The vignettes should be changed so they show only those fruits that are actually found in each product.

We request that you notify this office in writing within 15 days of receipt of this letter stating the action you will take to discontinue the marketing of these products or to otherwise bring them into compliance. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in enforcement action being initiated without further notice. The Act provides for seizure of illegal products and/or injunction against the manufacturer and/or distributor of illegal products.

This letter does not represent a comprehensive review of all of the products distributed by your firm. It also does not represent a complete review of all product labeling or promotional materials, including any Internet websites, you may use. As the president, it is your responsibility to ensure that all products distributed by your firm meet the requirements of the Act and its implementing regulations.

Your reply should be directed to the attention of Ms Shelly L. Maifarth, Compliance Officer, Food and Drug Administration at the attached letterhead address.

Sincerely,
/s/
Thomas A. Allison
Acting District Director

This page was posted on August 20, 2006.

饼干及面包

E excel踩到“地雷”了。
根据FDA的条律，营养食品是不能强调它们能医治疾病的。这因为是E Excel在打广告的时候，显示了这样的功效，是有“误导”消费者关于它的“医疗”功能。
So far只有几种食物可被认为有医疗的功能，但出产商必须有足够的医药临床研究报告，加上医药协会的承认才能使用。其中的食物包括黄豆的蛋白质(降低胆固醇,每天摄取25公克)。
所以E Excel用错宣传方法，拿到警告信了。

FernandoSor

低他们死！

曼联资本

都已经是7年前的事了只不过是警告信罢了，由于当时医学界还没有接受和认同保健公司的营养师和研究人员们所研究的理论，而且所有的营养食品和保健食品都不被医学界接受，政府一方面为了人民不会因标签的误导而服食一些有害或有副作用的食品，另一方面是也是保障医学的权威。毕竟医学的发展确实在紧急的时候就了很多人，也被世代认定的一门科学。所以所有政府就出了这条例：所有的营养和保健食品都不能强调它们能有治疗疾病的功能。一来也可以保障营养和保健公司不会因为说了可治疗XX疾病，最后又不能或反而病情更严重或还是因XX疾病而去世，而得到了保障。
就如维他命药丸、维生素补品，刚开始时大家都认为可以使大家健康，但是经过今年3月1日的一个报道（http://www.af99.com/article.asp?id=34）原来摄取单一的维生素却危害人的生命。就说维生素E、萝卜素，孕妇是不能服用这些补品，它会导致流产，但是孕妇却能吃萝卜。那是因为萝卜还有其它的植物营养素。

经过陈昭妃博士多年来的努力传播营养免疫学这门科学，现在很多医学界已经慢慢开始认同了，而且美国已开始所有的医生都必须到回去深造。很多大学的医学科也开始讲营养免疫学纳入必修课。

而且很多保健和营养公司也因此而获利，因为营养学的食品将会慢慢的被认同。。。看看您身边有保健的朋友，吃什么Organic食品，保健食品等等都意识到现在的社会污染太严重了，无时无刻的接触化学药品如蔬菜内杀虫药，肉类的长肉剂等等，所以只有预防胜于治疗才能健康。

说E excel踩到“地雷”了。倒不如说是它促进成长的转折点。。。使大家意识到健康的重要性。。。

DesmondT

丞燕惨了!被警告!怎么办?我很怕叻!会不会倒?

MarcusTan

首先要谢谢大家对丞燕都这么关心和关怀。。

第一，麻烦和拜托各位：这个事情是在2000年发生的，已经是足足有7年之久，恳请楼主尽可能了解了整个情况后才把帖子贴上来，当然还要感谢楼主对丞燕的关怀。

第二，看来楼上有些任兄对丞燕似乎很不满意。我可以说的是，我不能讲他人坏，所以我不方便去批评。况且，麻烦和拜托一下，以上这个案件是关于标签(LABELING)的问题，而不是丞燕产品出现什么问题。

第三，饼干仁兄说什么疗效的。有一样东西要和各位分享一下，丞燕产品是没有疗效的，是没有疗效的。丞燕产品是针对人体的免疫系统而使用适当及足够的营养去调节和强化我们的免疫力，达到健康的状态。尽可能不要去误会，丞燕产品是没有疗效的。

丞燕与众不同的是，它所教育和提倡的营养免疫学，也是有创办人陈昭妃博士研究的独门科学，同时受全医学世界的认同与肯定。

今天你会生病，99%是因为免疫系统出了问题。
所以，人体的免疫系统才是世界上最好的医生。

就这样，如果楼上的大大和各位对丞燕有什么问题的话，可以在这儿交流一下，以便可以跟大大们分享以及为你们解答。谢谢。

梦想之追求者

原来是夸大了疗效而已,只要不夸大就好

饼干及面包

Dear Marcus, 谢谢您的帖子。
我认同人生病时是免疫系统转弱，我们要饱尝健康就应该强化我们的免疫系统。

MarcusTan

原帖由 梦想之追求者 于 16-8-2007 10:45 AM 发表
原来是夸大了疗效而已,只要不夸大就好

不好意思，要纠正一下。。
丞燕产品是没有疗效的。。

谢谢。。