佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

楼主: jeffanb

槟城房地产投资

  [复制链接]
发表于 2-7-2014 05:37 AM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
miaw87 发表于 21-6-2014 02:55 PM
这里全部都是谈投资赚钱的。。。我这个小市民只想找比较便宜的都难。。。

http://www.penangpropertytalk.com/2014/07/hijau-e-komuniti/
如果条件符合, 赶快申请吧!
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 2-7-2014 06:05 AM | 显示全部楼层
165页了,说明槟城房子市场很坚挺阿

大陆的房子,除了4个一线城市(北,上,广,深),其他的今年都蛮惨

评分

参与人数 1人气 +3 收起 理由
Kidd_LV_Ass + 3 我很赞同

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 5-7-2014 03:55 PM | 显示全部楼层
会馆也搞起房产了。

产业地建高级公寓 槟广汀可赚千万回酬

槟州寸土如金,槟榔屿广汀会馆也加入发展列车,与一家发展公司在丹绒道光一片6万平方尺的会馆产业地推行高级公寓屋业计划,预计将为会馆带来上千万令吉计的回酬。

广汀会馆在3年前,即已萌起发展会馆在丹绒道光,即在砚壳油站(Marina Bay公寓毗邻)及金海景服务公寓对面一片6万平方尺甘榜地。

会馆在去年公开招标后,成功选定目前在丹绒道光推行Marinox Sky Villas屋业的一家发展公司进场,并以100年出租方式,与对方联合发展。发展公司将在计划下打造一栋40层楼高的高级公寓。

一切利益归会馆

新上任的槟榔屿广汀会馆会长准拿督祝友明向本报记者透露,有关计划将为会馆带来千万令吉的回酬,不过他斩钉截铁说计划将不会为会馆的董事信理(董信)带来任何好处,不会有“油水”可捞,一切利益将归会馆。

他说,会馆在3年前即已洽商洛64及65的发展事宜。“在公开招标后我们选定目前在丹绒道光发展Marinox Sky Villas公寓计划的同一家发展公司,对方也开出了合理交易条件。

他续说,会馆也从先前与汇华机构的发展合作中取得经验,所以此次与对方的合约是在多名会馆律师的详读后拟定,合约条文也更为清楚,没任何含糊字眼,一切透明化处理。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 5-7-2014 04:02 PM | 显示全部楼层
有東方花園之稱的檳城,住宅產業交易保持活躍,其中轉手市場對比首要市場的比率分別是70:30,以交易宗數來說,2012全年,首要市場佔31%、或7千302宗,轉手市場佔69%或1萬5千964宗,意即交易宗數共2萬3千266宗。

至於交易總值,首要市場佔26%或18億4千萬令吉、轉手市場74%或52億6千萬令吉。附圖反映2008至2012年之間,檳城住宅產業交易量與值走勢。

交易量與交易值
2011年最高

若以產業類型的交易來看,組屋最多,佔24%或5千692宗,接下來是2至3層排屋,佔18%或4千268宗、然後是公寓/共管公寓15%或3千578宗,再來是廉價組屋12%或2千702宗。

空地與2至3層半獨立式洋房各佔5%,交易宗數分別是1千零93宗和1千280宗,再來有單層半獨立式洋房及廉價房屋各佔3%,交易宗數分別是639宗和638宗,至於城市房屋及四合院各佔1%,交易宗數分別是190宗和239宗,其他產業交易只是7宗。

永利行國際產業顧問公司高級伙伴倪傳鵬說,從圖表走勢可以看出,檳城首要與轉手產業市場的交易量與值,在2010至2012年之間,以2011年最高,隨後在2012年趨於平穩,附圖可看出其分別。

另外,永利行也附帶大馬住宅產業交易宗數與價值供對比,從中估算出檳城住宅產業在大馬產業交易宗數與價值所佔的比率。








回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 7-7-2014 05:37 PM | 显示全部楼层
有了这些大型计划,看来槟岛的房地产还可以玩很久哦。。。

GAMUDA Bhd is the favourite to land the job as the Project Development Partner (PDP) to oversee the implementation of key components of an integrated transportation plan on Penang island

The others in the running for the PDP job that is estimated at more than RM5.5bil for the initial phase are IJM Corp Bhd, MMC Corp Bhd, the Scomi Group and WCT Holdings Bhd.

The state that is expected to issue a request for proposal (RFP) exercise next month have made it clear that only companies with a minimum RM3bil annual turnover and a track record of 15 years can participate.

Two key components of the RFP would be to build a 17.5 kilometre light rail transit (LRT) project that connects the Komtar building to the airport and a link cutting across the island from Bayan Lepas to Tanjong Bungah.

The Bayan Lepas-Tanjong Bungah cuts across a mountainous terrain and would require tunnels.

“The LRT project alone is estimated at RM4.5bil,” said a source.

In return for implementing the entire transportation system, which is expected to cost RM27bil and to be done over many years, the PDP would be awarded with the rights to reclaim a sizeable amount of land in the state.

Sources familiar with the proposed plan said Gamuda met with the state government officials about two months ago to present its proposal.

“The proposal to construct a LRT line would need the license from the Federal Government which would be the responsibility of the PDP. For instance, if Gamuda wins the mandate, it would also be responsible for securing the licence,” the source said.

The Scomi Group is the dark horse for the project because it already has a mandate from the Federal Government to carry out a train project on the island.

“The mandate was given in 2008 but could not be implemented after the state government fell into the hands of the opposition,” said an industry official.

In exchange for carrying out the project, the state is giving the PDP the rights to reclaim large tracts of land and the option is in two areas on the island.

The first option is an area in the southern part of the island involving reclamation of some 2,000 acres of which about 30% or some 600 acres will be carved out for the state for the future expansion of the Penang International Airport and to enlarge the Free Industrial Zone (FIZ).

The other option is for the PDP to reclaim the seagrass land located in between the Penang Bridge and the river mouth of Sungai Pinang, which is popularly known as the Middle Bank seagrass.

The state has already indicated that it would start work on an integrated transportation master plan last month.

In relation to this, on June 13, Penang Local Government, Traffic Management and Flood Mitigation Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow had said in a press conference the Penang government would call for a RFP in August for companies to bid to be the Project Delivery Partner (PDP) in the state’s Penang Transport Master Plan strategy.

According to Chow, the appointed PDP must be a reliable partner to the state to guarantee the projects’ delivery.

“They will have to oversee all the projects with costs estimated at RM27bil. The costs cover highway infrastructure (RM16bil) and public transport (RM9bil). The institutional costs amount to RM905mil,” Chow had said during the press conference held in June.

Chow had said that any interested company or consortium comprising local or international companies could take part in the RFP and the submission period was open for three months. Chow said the appointed PDP had to ensure that the projects complied with government policies and procedures, and obtain all relevant approvals including securing of funds.

He said the PDP would not be working on the projects but only acting as a consultant to the state.

“However, the PDP will be involved in the calling for tender process of the transport master plan projects and will have to step in should the contractors fail to deliver, either to replace the contractors or to do it themselves under their own cost,” Chow had said.

The concept is almost similar to Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng’s plan to build a tunnel between Penang island and Butterworth together with a traffic dispersal system near the Gurney Drive and Tanjong Bungah area.

The project was awarded to Consortium Zenith BUCG Sdn Bhd, a joint venture between a Malaysian company and a China company. The entire project is expected to cost RM6.3bil and is to be paid by the company having some 110 acres of land in the reclaimed area of Tanjong Tokong.

Source: StarProperty.my

评分

参与人数 1人气 +5 收起 理由
jeffanb + 5 谢谢分享

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 7-7-2014 08:55 PM | 显示全部楼层
cmdrun 发表于 5-7-2014 04:02 PM
有東方花園之稱的檳城,住宅產業交易保持活躍,其中轉手市場對比首要市場的比率分別是70:30,以交易宗數來 ...

这篇报道有造市之嫌,已经来到2014, 还拿2013 上半年数据来报道。

回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
发表于 7-7-2014 11:31 PM | 显示全部楼层
请问楼主,Desa Rahmat (Graceland villa) 买来投资有潜质吗? 地点的确很好,不用塞进relau区,对面就是Pisa Spice, 将来还会起酒店。。买来投资划算吗? 谢谢
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 8-7-2014 01:13 AM | 显示全部楼层
芝麻街 发表于 24-5-2014 02:02 PM
jeff 大人,请问一百万到一百四十万,除了 sungai ara, 摈岛可买到那个好房? 小第找的是地下屋, 自住, 要 ...

可以考虑Southbay Residence...
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 9-7-2014 03:42 PM | 显示全部楼层
请问下有人了解airmas在大山脚的 79 condo 吗? 值得买吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-7-2014 05:16 PM | 显示全部楼层
养猴人 发表于 7-7-2014 11:31 PM
请问楼主,Desa Rahmat (Graceland villa) 买来投资有潜质吗? 地点的确很好,不用塞进relau区,对面就是Pi ...

以地点,可以用250-280千的预算买到有一些设施的公寓,在槟岛已经卖少见少。这间公寓应该有些年龄了,外观真的很惨了,也许就是这个原因才会卖这个价吧。买来收租,等整座公寓油漆过,应该还不错的。过多3,4年有机会上到320-350千的价位。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 10-7-2014 11:36 AM | 显示全部楼层
以下是关于消费税的文章,觉得很不错,在此跟大家分享讨论.

文章结论是:

1)消费税使到楼价全线一次性的升幅

2)虽然开发商可能不会向购房者消费税,他们可以通过隐含的销售价格转移成本

3)整体价格上涨- 新住宅物业上涨比商业物业低

4)二手房产市场应该会看到价格显著的影响

How GST Will Impact Home Prices & The Property Market
July 8th, 2014 Leave a comment

WITH the coming implementation of Goods & Service Tax (GST) in April 2015, many Malaysians are concerned with what this bodes for prices in general. It is inevitable that home prices will also be affected. In this article, we explain how home and property prices will be affected moving forward.

To properly appreciate how GST will affect home prices, it is necessary to first understand how GST works. (Click here for a detailed but simple-to-understand explanation of how GST in Malaysia works).

Aside from GST, one must also have an understanding of the Sales Tax, which is the existing tax scheme affecting the property sector. GST will supplant the Sales Tax come April 2015.

Tax Scheme on Residential Property – The Similarities

In comparing both tax schemes, we have to first identify their similarities.

One similarity between GST and the existing Sales Tax scheme is that no taxes are charged or will be charged to the consumer on the purchase of a home / residential property. For GST, residential properties fall under the “Exempt Rated” basket of goods.(But do take note that GST will be charged to the consumer for commercial property purchases as commercial properties are “Standard Rated”).

However, during the creation of the final product (also known as the input stage in tax parlance), under both tax schemes, developers would incur taxes during procurement of their inputs and materials. And this is where the differences start to become apparent between both tax schemes. The tax rate for inputs and materials vary between GST and Sales Tax.

Sales Tax VS GST for Residential Properties – The Differences

Based on the Sales Tax Act of 1972, basic building materials such as bricks, cement and floor tiles fall inside First Schedule Goods, in which all the goods in this category will not be subjected to sales tax. Meanwhile, other building materials fall inside Second Schedule Goods, in which all the goods in this category will only be charged sales tax of 5%.

Under the new GST implementation, all building materials and services (E.g. Contractors, engineers) will be subject to GST with a standard rate of 6%. This will invariably raise the production cost for developers.

If you understand how GST works, you will notice that in most cases, the additional tax cost is simply passed on to the final consumer (Standard-Rated goods), or is claimed back from the government (Zero-Rated goods). But in this case (Exempt-Rated), the additional tax cost is borne by the party before the final consumer – The developer.

The developer does not have a next “victim” in the supply chain.
This seems like good news for home buyers as they do not have to pay GST when purchasing a home. However, one should not be too happy about this. It is no stretch of the imagination to think that developers would try to build in the additional tax costs into the final sale price implicitly.

Before & After GST – A Comparison

The tables below show a comparison between the cost of a new property before and after GST. Certain taxes and costs leading up to the sale to the final consumer have been simplified for this purpose.

Also, an assumption is made that developers are able to transfer 100% of all incurred tax costs over to the consumer via the sale price.

The example above shows a price increase of 3.41% for new residential properties post-GST implementation. But there is a plus point to this.

Overall, new residential properties may register a lower overall increase in tax burden compared to Commercial Properties that are Standard-Rated. This is because there still is the chance that developers may only transfer some and not all of their tax cost increases into the final retail price.

The downside to this is that where pricing for new commercial properties will be cleaner (Sales Price + GST), pricing for new residential homes would look inflated. This, in turn, will undoubtedly have a knock on effect on prices in the secondary house market.

Conclusion

As a home buyer, it pays to know what the implementation of GST might bode for home prices moving forward. If you skipped the entire article, here are all the key insights in a nutshell:

1)      With GST, there should be a once-off increase in property prices across the board

2)      While developers may not bill home buyers for GST, they could transfer the costs implicitly via the sale price

3)      The overall price increase for new residential properties could be marginally lower than that for new commercial properties

4)      The secondary home market should see a knock on effect in prices

Armed with this knowledge, you can make a better decision on when to purchase your home.

Source: StarProperty.my
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 10-7-2014 11:37 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-7-2014 03:10 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
Sungai ara 的 the clovers 1k sqf RM500k,值得投资吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 14-7-2014 10:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeffanb 发表于 25-6-2014 05:33 PM
不太清楚这个计划,地点当然是不错的。如果full condo facilities, freehold, residential title, 两个 ...

你讲的都是,都有。furnish就有基本厨房的厨,4部air cond
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 15-7-2014 10:48 AM | 显示全部楼层
The Kew 在 Minden Heights i-Rengency 后面。发展商: http://www.levaenterprise.com/



评分

参与人数 2人气 +10 收起 理由
jeffanb + 5 谢谢分享
darienong + 5 谢谢分享

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 16-7-2014 04:59 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeffanb:
       你好,我朋友的孩子在UPLAND国际学校读书,考虑在Batu Ferringhi买一间屋子自助3-5年(有地屋),然后出手或者做旅游屋,初步看了FERRINGHI VILLA,能否谈一下您对这个项目的看法,主要想听不好的那一面的观点!
       谢谢!

回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 16-7-2014 05:01 PM | 显示全部楼层

jeffanb:
    不知我说清楚没有,就是想听您对这个项目,有啥不好的方面的那些观点!
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 16-7-2014 05:54 PM | 显示全部楼层
dodojinan 发表于 16-7-2014 05:01 PM
jeffanb:
    不知我说清楚没有,就是想听您对这个项目,有啥不好的方面的那些观点!

如果孩子在upland念书,地点绝对是没问题的。几个要考虑的重点是:

1)未来Tg Bungah 到 Teluk Bahang 的双向道“好像”会从FV的后方经过;
2)未来MRCB的新计划就在FV的前面;
3)很多单位用来短期出租问题;
4)因为有些单位搁置,需要考虑白蚁的问题;

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 16-7-2014 10:28 PM | 显示全部楼层
jeffanb 发表于 16-7-2014 05:54 PM
如果孩子在upland念书,地点绝对是没问题的。几个要考虑的重点是:

1)未来Tg Bungah 到 Teluk Bahang ...

MRCB是什么计划,根据您掌握的资料,能说一下嘛,这一点没有考虑!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 17-7-2014 02:09 PM | 显示全部楼层
cmdrun 发表于 15-7-2014 10:48 AM
The Kew 在 Minden Heights i-Rengency 后面。发展商: http://www.levaenterprise.com/

大概RM700 psf,2100 sq ft 以上。会直通 Bukit Gambier。看来是高档的condo。

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 15-12-2024 10:27 AM , Processed in 0.132790 second(s), 29 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表