佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

楼主: followme123

[以數論事] 爲什麽 馬來西亞人 的 平均IQ 這麽低?

 关闭 [复制链接]
发表于 9-6-2018 10:38 AM | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 白布飘扬 于 9-6-2018 10:39 AM 编辑

与其谈论他人的智商,不如测试自己的智商。

来,去免费测试,看自己的成绩。

回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 9-6-2018 10:56 AM | 显示全部楼层
诈西这种货色都可以坐上大马第二把交椅(曾经),如果在小新,他做什么? 驾的士?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 11:34 AM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
难道 北极熊  IQ 高过黑熊?
论工作能力 ,经验 和 学术背景  。。。
单用肤色  未免有点那个 。。。勉强。。


回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 11:39 AM | 显示全部楼层

等下你就被 左膠 圍攻了
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 11:40 AM | 显示全部楼层
geoomar 发表于 9-6-2018 01:34 PM
难道 北极熊  IQ 高过黑熊?
论工作能力 ,经验 和 学术背景  。。。
单用肤色  未免有点那个 。。。勉强。。

我沒有說單用膚色哦,搞清楚
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 11:40 AM | 显示全部楼层
novation 发表于 9-6-2018 12:56 PM
诈西这种货色都可以坐上大马第二把交椅(曾经),如果在小新,他做什么? 驾的士?

息怒,華人 已經掌權了,還跟那些 印尼仔 計較什麽
回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 11:47 AM | 显示全部楼层
leekoung001 发表于 9-6-2018 12:37 PM
楼主, 你引用的数据来自以  Richard Lynn, 你知道他的背景吗?
wiki 的资料
Richard Lynn (born 20 February 1930)[1] is an English psychologist and author. He is a former professor emeritus of psychol ...

很多正確的科學理論因爲政治不正確而被攻擊,可是真理並不會因爲你不認同而無效


James Watson: There Are Definitely Genetic Differences in Intelligence






[size=1.0625]Dr. James Watson can't help but speak his mind. And this has gotten the co-discoverer of DNA's double-helix in trouble in the past. He has been called, among other things, sexist, racist, and elitist. He retired from his role as Chancellor of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in 2007 after claiming that black people are genetically less intelligent than whites.
[size=1.0625]In his Big Think interview, Watson reasserted that there are definitely genetic differences in intelligence. But he says we don't know very much about these differences though because psychology is "totally dominated by political correctness." And because we are unwilling to pinpoint people who are unable to learn, we are "avoiding maybe learning somehow and someday to make out brains work better," he says. "Political correctness has never been a way toward the truth. It’s like, you know, saying something is religiously correct."

[size=1.0625]Watson also discussed the key breakthroughs in the search for the double helix back in the 1950s. He also cleared up the role that fellow Cambridge biophysicist Rosalind Franklin played in the discovery. She did, he admits, contribute some crucial pieces of information, but she was adamantly against the idea of DNA being a double helix. Her great handicap (likely a form of Asperger's syndrome) was that she could not deal with other people or ask for help, Watson says. "If she'd come out to Cambridge and shown her data to Crick, Crick quickly would have told her how to solve her problem."
[size=1.0625]A half-century after Watson's DNA discovery, scientists are finally able to map a whole human genome. Craig Venter, whom Watson calls "a great marketer," was the first to have his genome mapped, but Watson was the second. And he learned a couple of important things about his genetic predispositions. First of all, he discovered he metabolized certain drugs more slowly than most people, which could prove a risk if he took to many of them. If he were given an anti-psychotic, for instance, it could potentially kill him. He also learned that he was lactose intolerant, which explains the constant stomach pains he had while he was working out the DNA structure. He thought his condition was a result of nervousness, not the quart of milk he was drinking each day.
[size=1.0625]In the last few decades, Watson has turned his focus from DNA to cancer, and he talked with us about some of the most exciting avenues currently opening up in cancer research. He also is deeply interested in mental illness, in part because his son suffers from schizophrenia. "The mentally ill are treated very cruelly," he says. "We sort of deny their existence; Congress has virtually no interest in them." Watson says that mental disorders like schizophrenia are entirely genetic, at least a predisposition for them. Whether or not they will progress to the full-blown disorder depends on environmental factors, including drugs. Marijuana, he says, can trigger schizophrenia in someone who is predisposed to the disease.





回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 12:01 PM | 显示全部楼层
首先, 你必须确定它是正確的科學理論.  IQ评鉴本身就有很多争议。它引导出来的结论就是可疑的
社会科学不像自然科学那样明确。很难被证实为真或假。毕竟社会科学的实验环境一致性无法确保。
所以社会科学的很多结论本身容易被有心人士利用。
如果你真心讨论人种和IQ之间的关系, 请小心求证。 如果你是有心人士, 那我就没什么话说了。

回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 12:22 PM | 显示全部楼层
白布飘扬 发表于 9-6-2018 12:38 PM
与其谈论他人的智商,不如测试自己的智商。

来,去免费测试,看自己的成绩。


我沒有作弊的,測得 IQ 為 118


<a href="http://www.free-iqtest.net" title="IQ Test"><img src="http://www.free-iqtest.net/images/badges2/l118.gif" width="200" height="100" alt="IQ Test" border="0"></a><br/><a title="IQ Test" href="http://www.free-iqtest.net">IQ Test</a>
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 12:32 PM | 显示全部楼层
leekoung001 发表于 9-6-2018 02:01 PM
首先, 你必须确定它是正確的科學理論.  IQ评鉴本身就有很多争议。它引导出来的结论就是可疑的
社会科学不像自然科学那样明确。很难被证实为真或假。毕竟社会科学的实验环境一致性无法确保。
所以社会科学的很多 ...


你這種是硬科學(hard science)的思維,所有理論都必須因果清晰,環環相扣


我們做大數據分析的,是不講因果的(有點類似量子力學),只看關聯度(correlation)


IQ 評鑒的確有很多爭議,但只要拿來跟 人均GDP 這類參數進行對比分析,就可以得出非常明顯的 correlation



sft2fig7.gif


sftfi1{image2}.gif


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 12:46 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
白布飘扬 发表于 9-6-2018 10:38 AM
与其谈论他人的智商,不如测试自己的智商。

来,去免费测试,看自己的成绩。

我跑去玩了,来打发时间。

拿到140。
太平洋和英格兰,不难猜。
数学题完全靠估估下,蒙中了。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 01:01 PM | 显示全部楼层

溫度的確影響計算能力。
憤青時常處於高溫狀態,以致思考能力下降。

Overclocking to 7GHz takes more than just liquid nitrogen

评分

参与人数 1人气 +5 收起 理由
followme123 + 5 谢谢分享

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 01:02 PM | 显示全部楼层
白布飘扬 发表于 9-6-2018 10:38 AM
与其谈论他人的智商,不如测试自己的智商。

来,去免费测试,看自己的成绩。



https://www.mensaiqtest.net


回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 01:04 PM | 显示全部楼层
一燈大師 发表于 9-6-2018 03:02 PM
https://www.mensaiqtest.net

我進不到 mensa
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 01:09 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
楼主知道关于老李说的冷气理论的确教育了我,因为我从来都没看过那份报章报道的。
不过您自己的智商是多少?
为何给的三项选择是全部都可以选的?
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 9-6-2018 01:15 PM | 显示全部楼层
556688 发表于 9-6-2018 03:09 PM
楼主知道关于老李说的冷气理论的确教育了我,因为我从来都没看过那份报章报道的。
不过您自己的智商是多少?
为何给的三项选择是全部都可以选的?


我沒有作弊做了那份測試,測得 IQ 是 118,比 新加坡 的國民平均來得高。這並不意外,畢竟我讀的都是 Times Ranking 前50名的大學






可以選三項,不代表三項都要選,選擇權在於你
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 9-6-2018 01:27 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
followme123 发表于 9-6-2018 01:15 PM
我沒有作弊做了那份測試,測得 IQ 是 118,比 新加坡 的國民平均來得高。這並不意外,畢竟我讀的都是 Times Ranking 前50名的大學






可以選三項,不代表三項都要選,選擇權在於你

哦。谢谢你的回答。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 01:33 PM | 显示全部楼层



加油,我也到達不了 136.


回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 02:55 PM | 显示全部楼层
followme123 发表于 9-6-2018 12:22 PM
我沒有作弊的,測得 IQ 為 118


IQ Test

IQ 為 118 ???
到我考你
是先有蛋还是先有鸡?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 9-6-2018 03:03 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
oyak5155 发表于 9-6-2018 03:02 AM
和气温无关,和教育程度有关。

这里几个华人,明显智障,拉低华人平均智商。

很明显 你也被感染了

评分

参与人数 1人气 +5 收起 理由
followme123 + 5 精品文章

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 17-11-2025 04:34 PM , Processed in 0.162635 second(s), 31 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表