有两样事情要告诉你.........
1.你提到的P9, S7, G5所用的处理器都是顶级别的, 你去看看楼主说的A9 Plus是处理器又是什么级别
现在楼主要比的是mate 8和A9 plus, 不是你上面说的这些
2.你说的youtube p9 vs htc10, 比的是loading speed..........为什么htc10会输? 是因为它用了令读取速度人失望的eMMC
而P9用的是uFS............分别就好像电脑HDD和SSD的分别
“If you were fully expecting the HTC 10 to perform worse than the Samsung Galaxy S7 here like I was, you'll probably be surprised to learn that it doesn't actually do worse all the time. In this test at least, write performance of the HTC 10 is 75% greater than the Samsung MLC UFS solution in the Galaxy S7 due to the use of an SLC write cache. However, sequential reads on the Galaxy S7 are about 35% higher than what they are on the HTC 10. The same sort of pattern repeats itself in the random read and write tests for AndroBench 4, so at a high level it's pretty fair to say that things like burst camera photos, app updates, and similar write-intensive operations are going to be faster on the HTC 10, while read-intensive operations like loading apps may be slightly faster on the Galaxy S7 if storage reads are the critical path. Overall, it's clear to me that the HTC 10 could be a contender for high end Android smartphones. If you were just to go down the spec sheet, it's probably fairly easy to conclude that HTC can't really go toe to toe with Samsung. However, with our tests so far there is a surprising amount of nuance to all of these comparisons that has to be considered. Battery life seems to be worse than the Galaxy S7 if you just consider display or SoC efficiency, but in a mixed use scenario HTC manages to close the gap. NAND performance seems to inevitably trail the Galaxy S7, but with the right eMMC selection HTC has a significant lead in write performance in all scenarios”
| 
本周最热论坛帖子
发表于 15-7-2016 02:13 PM
这不是吵...........这里是论坛, 一个给大家提供意见和看法的平台. 这就是论坛的目的
1761 
64
