|
EADS受促卖掉不被看好的阵风生产商!(EADS同时也持有台风生产商)
[复制链接]
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 1-7-2014 02:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 14-8-2014 10:34 AM
|
显示全部楼层
detectivebinbin 发表于 3-9-2013 06:56 PM 
不可以這麼說,純屬禮尚往來……畢竟俄系戰機也是法國巴黎航空展的常客,甚至還曾在表演時大方的把戰機摔 ...
现Janata的主席多几天跟国防部长和首相meeting将要求取消阵风合约!  
The BJP’s stormy petrel Subramanian Swamy has for long been publicly opposed to the $22 billion Rafale deal, to the point of even suggesting that there was more to the UPA government’s choice than met the eye. In February 2012, The Sunday Times of London quoted Swamy as saying he had initially been told the Eurofighter had won the deal to supply 126 fighter jets but that it all changed after the entry of a veteran French consultant, Bernard Baiocco, an ex-employee of the defence firm Thales, which contributes radar and electronic systems to Rafale. “Baiocco was here (in Delhi) and he went around, and everything changed after that,” Swamy had said, explaining the UPA’s sudden change of heart. With the Modi government poised to indicate its choice, Swamy spoke to Pranay Sharma. Excerpts:
What do you think of the Rafale deal?
It stinks right through. The deal should be frozen or scrapped and negotiations for the MMRCA should begin afresh.
Why do you say this?
There are a number of reasons but foremost Rafale was finalised not through commercial negotiation; it was done by private conversations between Sonia Gandhi, her sisters and Carla Bruni, wife of then French president Nicolas Sarkozy.
Your other objections... No country outside France has so far bought the Rafale. Some countries had shortlisted it, but rejected it later. We must find out why they did so. We must also know why it is so much more expensive than the other competitors. With the kind of money India has pledged to buy the planes, it can actually buy over the entire company that makes them. Moreover, there are also reports that it is trying to win the contract by giving a subcontract to an influential Indian industrialist. In addition, its performance in terms of fuel consumption etc was much higher and unimpressive during the recent Libyan campaign.
So what should be done about the Rafale deal?
I had written to the UPA defence minister A.K. Antony citing reports and the information on the Sonia Gandhi family’s link with Carla Bruni. Being an honorable man sensitive about his image and reputation, Antony had frozen negotiations with Rafale. I am not sure why Arun Jaitley decided to defreeze it.
The BJP’s in power. Will you ask for Rafale deal to be scrapped?
We have a party meeting coming up in a few days. I will raise the issue not only with defence minister Jaitley but also with PM Narendra Modi. I’ll definitely bring it to their notice.
http://www.outlookindia.com/article/The-Rafale-Deal-Should-Be-Scrapped-And-Renegotiated/291635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 14-8-2014 10:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
印度媒体也大力反对阵风了!   
http://www.newindianexpress.com/ ... /article2346825.ece
Why Rafale is a Big Mistake
ByBharat Karnad Published: 25th July 2014
Why would India buy the Rafale combat aircraft rejected by every other interested country—Brazil, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Singapore, and even the cash-rich but not particularly discriminating Saudi Arabia and Morocco?
The French foreign minister Laurent Fabius’s one-point agenda when he visited New Delhi was to seal the deal for Rafale, a warplane apparently fitting IAF’s idea of a Medium Multi-role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) in the service’s unique typology, which includes “light” and “heavy” fighter planes as well, used by no other air force in the world. Alas, the first whiff of corruption led the previous defence minister, A K Antony, to seize up and shut shop, stranding the deal at the price negotiation committee stage. It is this stoppage Fabius sought to unclog.
France’s desperation is understandable. Absent the India deal, the Rafale production line will close down, the future of its aerospace sector will dim, and the entire edifice of French industrial R&D sector based on small and medium-sized firms—a version of the enormously successful German “Mittelstand” model—engaged in producing cutting-edge technologies could unravel, and grease France’s slide to second-rate technology power-status.
More immediately, it will lead to a marked increase in the unit cost of the aircraft—reportedly of as much as $5-$10 million dollars to the French Air Force, compelling it to limit the number it inducts. With no international customers and France itself unable to afford the pricey Rafale, the French military aviation industry will be at a crossroads. So, for Paris a lot is at stake and in India the French have found an easy mark, a country willing to pay excessively for an aircraft the IAF can well do without.
Consider the monies at stake. Let’s take the example of Brazil, our BRICS partner. For 36 Rafales the acquisition cost, according to Brazilian media, was $8.2 billion plus an additional $4 billion for short-period maintenance contracts, amounting to nearly $340 million per aircraft in this package and roughly $209 million as the price tag for a single Rafale without maintenance support. Brazil insisted on transfer of technology (ToT) and was told it had to pay a whole lot extra for it, as also for the weapons for its Rafales. But the Brazilian air force had doubts about the quality of the AESA (active electronically scanned array) radar enabling the aircraft to switch quickly from air-to-air to air-to-ground mode in flight, and about the helmet-mounted heads-up-display. Too high a price and too many problems convinced the government of president Dilma Rousseff that the Rafale was not worth the trouble or the money and junked the deal, opting for the Swedish Gripen NG instead.
During the Congress party’s rule the Indian government did not blink at the prospective bill for the Rafale, which more than doubled from $10 billion in 2009 to some $22 billion today, and which figure realistically will exceed $30 billion, or $238 million per aircraft, at a minimum. But India, unbeknownst to most of us, is apparently a terribly rich country, with money to burn! Meanwhile, the United Kingdom, an apparently poorer state or at least one more careful with its money, is blanching at the $190 million price tag for each of the 60 Lockheed F-35Bs (vertical take-off, technologically more complex, variant of the air force model)—a full generation ahead of the Rafale—ordered for the first of the Royal Navy’s Queen Elizabeth-class 65,000-tonne aircraft carriers.
The prohibitive cost of the French aircraft supposedly made finance-cum-defence minister Arun Jaitley apprehensive. He did the right thing, as is rumoured, of revising the order downwards from 126 aircraft to 80 or so Rafales. The IAF headquarters pre-emptively acquiesced in the decision to save the deal. However, if this change was affected in the hope of proportionately reducing the cost, it will be belied. Because in contracts involving high-value combat aircraft, the size of the order does not much affect the unit price, the cost of spares and service support, and of ToT! This is evident from the rough estimates of the per aircraft cost to Brazil of $209 million for 36 Rafales compared with the $238 million for 126 of the same aircraft to India!
Because New Delhi has been inclined to make India a military “great power” on the basis of imported armaments—a policy that’s a boon to supplier states as it generates employment and new technologies in these countries, and sustains their defence industries, a confident French official told me with respect to another deal that “India will pay the price”. Considering the various negatives of the proposed deal and the long-term national interest Jaitley would do well to nix the Rafale transaction altogether.
The bureaucratic interest of the IAF prompts it to exaggerate wrong threats and talk of declining fighter assets. But it will not tell the defence minister about the logistics hell routinely faced by frontline squadrons in operations owing to the mindboggling diversity of combat aircraft in its inventory, a problem only the Rafale acquisition will exacerbate and, hence, about the urgent need to rationalise the force structure, ideally to Su-30s, the indigenous Tejas Mk-1 for short-range air defence, Tejas Mk-II as MMRCA, and the Su-50 PAK FA as fifth-generation fighter. Nor will the department of defence production officials disclose to Jaitley that the ToT provisions in arms contracts are a fraudulent farce because, while the foreign suppliers pocket billions of dollars, no core technologies, such as source codes (millions of lines of software) and flight control laws, are ever transferred. And that the local defence industry monopolised by defence public sector units (DPSUs) is incapable of absorbing and innovating even such technology as is, in fact, relayed to it because it only assembles aircraft from imported kits.
Terminating the Rafale deal will be disruptive but sending the message to the military, the DPSUs, the defence ministry bureaucracy, and foreign companies salivating for rich, one-sided, contracts that the Narendra Modi government is determined to make a new start and conduct defence business differently, is more important.
The author is professor at the Centre for Policy Research and blogs at www.bharatkarnad.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 3-10-2014 03:31 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-10-2014 07:03 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 3-10-2014 08:40 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 4-10-2014 07:31 PM
|
显示全部楼层
如果问题没法在T3身上解决,新机应该很难卖。
现在有问题的是T1&T2,
T3还没正试量产。
德国台风战机发现制造缺陷 致使机身寿命减半2014-10-04

10月3日报道 埃菲社10月1日报道称,德国国防部9月30日表示,欧洲“台风”战斗机被发现有一处缺陷,虽然不影响战斗机的安全,但将导致其使用寿命减半。
德国国防部在声明中表示,根据飞机生产厂商的指示,目前德国的“台风”战斗机飞行总时长不能超过1500小时,而非最初预计的3000小时。
然而,无论是在执行实际任务还是在飞行训练中,这一点都不会对“台风”战斗机的使用造成危险。
据德国国防部透露,这处缺陷是由参与制造该飞机的英国航空航天系统公司发现的,目前该公司已着手研究如何解决这一问题。
报道称,飞机机身后部的衔接处在质量检测中被发现存在缺陷,原因是接缝的孔眼并没有制作到位。
德国军方最近几周因后勤问题影响行动能力而饱受批评,此前相继有两架飞机在前往伊拉克北部执行运输任务时出现故障。空军109架“台风”战斗机中能够立即起飞的只有42架。
德国《法兰克福汇报》网站9月30日报道说,新技术缺陷令德国联邦国防军苦恼。德国联邦国防军在其网站上公布,德国的欧洲战斗机在质量检查过程中被发现机身后部存在大量孔洞这样的制造缺陷。
作为紧急措施,制造商将该战机的飞行寿命由3000小时减半至1500小时,据说原因是“额外的安全因素”。但是,目前德国联邦国防军离这个值也很远:据“Augen geradeaus”安全政策网站报道,服役最久的这种类型的战斗机,飞行时间只有1000小时。
德国联邦国防军决定暂时不再向生产商购买这种战机。该战机由包括德国空中客车公司和英国航空航天系统公司在内的财团联合制造。德国联邦审计署今年春天估计,德国购买欧洲战斗机的总成本将增加一倍,增加到大约600亿欧元。
http://news.qq.com/a/20141004/012382.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-10-2014 07:37 PM
|
显示全部楼层
cyberjaye 发表于 4-10-2014 07:31 PM 
如果问题没法在T3身上解决,新机应该很难卖。
现在有问题的是T1&T2,
T3还没正试量产。
真是災難性的後果,德國空軍軍力真的直接插水
要換一批戰機可需要筆為數不小的小錢錢啊 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 4-10-2014 07:41 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-10-2014 07:45 PM
|
显示全部楼层
cyberjaye 发表于 4-10-2014 07:41 PM 
减少出巡和寿命减半,还不至于要马上换。
不过,如果T3解决了这个问题的话,反而可能提早获得新合同。 ...
我看到有些媒體寫德國空軍多架颱風趴窩了
不知情報可靠否
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 25-11-2014 11:29 PM
|
显示全部楼层
alex92 发表于 4-10-2014 07:45 PM 
我看到有些媒體寫德國空軍多架颱風趴窩了
不知情報可靠否
AESA来的及时,德国可以买T3 + AESA了
这将是欧洲最强的战机,战力直迫SU35
台风的AESA比阵风的AESA强了30%,而且台风的RCS比阵风低
Typhoon Gets AESA RADAR
Marhalim Abas November 20, 2014
SHAH ALAM: Eurofighter Typhoon – one of the candidates for the RMAF’s MRCA programme – is finally getting an active electronically scanned (AESA) radar. An AESA radar is one of the main requirements of the MRCA programme. The Royal Air Force (RAF) is expected to be the first operator to fit the Captor E-Scan AESA radar among the four core nation of the Eurofighter. However no definitive deadline had been set for the fitment of the radar.

Typhoon fitted with the AESA radar
It must be noted that the other three candidates for the MRCA programme – namely the Super Hornet, Rafale and the Gripen (the NG version) are all AESA compliant. The Super Hornet is the only one which has seen action with the radar of course.

E-Scan Graphic
According to Defense News: “Aside from the four Eurofighter core partners, Typhoon is operated by Austria and Saudi Arabia and has been purchased by Oman. Potential customers, aside from a possible top-up order from the Saudis, include Bahrain, Qatar, Malaysia, Indonesia and Kuwait.”
本帖最后由 cyberjaye 于 25-11-2014 11:38 PM 编辑
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 2-1-2015 10:37 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 cyberjaye 于 9-1-2015 05:02 PM 编辑
@miyaTan
印度传来对俄国的利好消息!
可能不买阵风,增加生产俄国的SU30MKI~~
http://www.malaysiandefence.com/?p=5517
India’s Rafale Deal in Trouble?
Marhalim Abas January 2, 2015 Malaysia - RMAF
SHAH ALAM: India’s media is reporting that the government may opt for more locally built Sukhoi Su-30MKIs if the deal to build Dassault Rafale locally falls through.
Of interest to Malaysia, is the fact that the India locally built MKIs reportedly cost half of the projected price of the Rafale. The cost for the MKIs is quoted at Rs 358 crore (my calculations is US$56 million/RM196 million). If that is correct the Rafale should cost around RM392 million per plane!
If indeed India decide to forego the Rafale deal it may have repercussions for its future potential as this means that the aircraft has failed to gain any export customer. India and UAE are its biggest potential at the moment.
From Business Standard.
Rafale in storm clouds, Parrikar says IAF can make do with Sukhoi-30s
For the first time since January 31, 2012, when the French Rafale fighter was chosen as the future medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) for the Indian Air Force (IAF), it has been officially admitted that there are serious problems in negotiating the purchase with the French vendor, Dassault.
Speaking to the media on Tuesday evening, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar said there were “complications” in the negotiations, already on for almost three years, with the French side reluctant to meet commitments that IAF had specified in the tender. Parrikar did not reveal details.
Business Standard had reported on Dassault’s unwillingness to assume responsibility for the production of Rafales by Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, which the tender mandated. HAL is to build 108 Rafales in India with technology transferred from Dassault and its sub-vendors.
— Malaysian Defence
Eurofighter Typhoon fitted with the Storm Shadow cruise missile for testing. Eurofighter picture.
Eurofighter Typhoon fitted with the Storm Shadow cruise missile for testing. Eurofighter picture.
In the meantime, its Typhoon that is also hogging the latest news update. Within a space of two weeks, we were told that the Typhoon had successfully conducted trials involving two weapon types, the Meteor and the Storm Shadow.
Typhoon with Meteor. Eurofighter picture.
Typhoon with Meteor. Eurofighter picture.
The Meteor is an advanced BVR missile while the Storm Shadow is a long range precision air to ground weapon.Both missiles are expected to be in service on the Typhoon by 2017, a year before the Brimstone air to ground missiles is expected to be in service with the RAF Typhoon fleet.
Typhoon in a multi role configuration with Brimstone missiles and Paveway IV LGBs. Eurofighter picture.
Typhoon in a multi role configuration with Brimstone missiles and Paveway IV LGBs. Eurofighter picture.
Integration tests of the Brimstone took place recently in the UK. RAF Typhoon fleet also demonstrated recently it could carry 6 Paveway IV LGBs in a single sortie.
It must be noted that the RAF configuration of the Typhoon is the version being marketed to Malaysia for the MRCA programme. Unfortunately we are no closer to a decision on the programme today when it was first announced three or four years ago.
— Malaysian Defence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-1-2015 12:32 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-1-2015 12:56 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-1-2015 01:00 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 miyaTan 于 3-1-2015 01:01 AM 编辑
法国想是不是我的discount不给力? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 23-1-2015 01:39 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2015 04:06 PM
|
显示全部楼层
哈哈哈,我也是刚看到,法国人以为自己是谁呀?能吃定三哥???有没有毛熊的本事先???法国就是作........
确实好笑的是,三哥整天就是被人宰的角色,好惨
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|