|

楼主 |
发表于 25-1-2010 02:03 AM
|
显示全部楼层
http://www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=33430
Friends of Penang Hill not against upgrading of hill railway
Opalyn Mok
Dr Choong Sim Poey
GEORGE TOWN (May 13, 2009): The Friends of Penang Hill (FOPH) coalition has reiterated that it is not against the upgrading of the Penang Hill Railway but only wants a cheaper, faster and less disruptive project while retaining the heritage value of the current funicular system.
FOPH, which is made up of the Penang Hill Residents Association and Penang Heritage Trust (PHT), said the residents of Penang Hill have suffered from the poor service of the hill railway for so long and welcomed any improvement to the service.
"We are also aware that this RM40 million hill railway project is a federal government project and we welcome it in principle," it said in a press statement signed by Penang Hill Residents Association president Arunasalam @ Raja and PHT president Dr Choong Sim Poey.
The group is of the opinion that it is possible to upgrade the system and achieve the same capacity in a manner which will be cheaper, faster and therefore less disruptive to residents and traders while retaining its heritage value.
"The method proposed by the Public Works Department (PWD) will create a completely modern system with two new stations, new machinery and an altered alignment of the track which will require the cutting of trees and slopes," the group said.
"In planning for the upgrade, the PWD did not consult the stakeholders and did not give sufficient consideration to its heritage value," the group said.
It said the PWD will be destroying something unique and replacing it with a modern system that will not have any heritage value.
It said all the residents on the hill, especially the poor farmers at the the middle station, are worried about their livelihood during the long construction period.
The FOPH had raised the issue earlier, saying the PWD had not given sufficient time to contractors to prepare their bids for the project.
It had also crticised the PWD and the federal government for not consulting the stakeholders on the project and had urged the PWD to organise a public forum on the project with the stakeholders.
Retired Tramway engineer Ric Francis, who authored the book Penang Trams, Trolleybuses & Railways, had written to theSun to say the funicular railway system can be upgraded at a lower cost than the proposed project without needing to replace the whole system.
Recently, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the federal government should have sought the views of all the stakeholders before carrying out the project.
中文。。。
中央政府采取行动之前没有征求居民意见。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 08:33 AM
|
显示全部楼层
中文。。。
中央政府采取行动之前没有征求居民意见。。。
alena54680 发表于 25-1-2010 02:03 AM 
又是中央政府的问题?州政府是死的哦 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 10:03 AM
|
显示全部楼层
缆车提升與美化没有什么不好。不然缆车时常都坏,而来到的游客都尽兴而来败兴而归,你又可忍心?
如果真的要保持古迹,可以建个博物馆,把旧的缆车和照片放在那里也可以。我看你不会为了保持古迹而不发展槟城吧?你要保持槟城保持到好像槟城博物院里的那些照片?如果是的话,第一天就不该发展,别驾车,驾牛车好了。
为了保持古迹而食故不化,缆车一而再再而三的不能操作和让人感到不安全的话,是不是要等不好的事情发生了才来补救?
如果是的话,那时,不懂又有多少张嘴巴要来说了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 10:08 AM
|
显示全部楼层
缆车提升與美化没有什么不好。不然缆车时常都坏,而来到的游客都尽兴而来败兴而归,你又可忍心?
如果真的 ...
MMO 发表于 25-1-2010 10:03 AM 
如果要发展现代化,当初就不要申请世遗
香港和槟城是不一样啊,一粒苹果和一粒橙子怎么比?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 10:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
不是只是停十个月吗?忍耐十个月后就有新的缆车,我觉得还可以接受。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 11:51 AM
|
显示全部楼层
古迹是发展的绊脚石。。。
历史就让他过去吧。。。
我们需要更好的明天。。。
古迹只需要象征式的保留就够了。。。
古老又不世纪的东西被淘汰是难以避免的。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 12:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
只要象征似的保留古迹,因为安全理由而应该要更新的,都应该敢敢去做,尝试两全其美。
不要再等发生事情,搞出人命,那时候后悔太迟了 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 12:31 PM
|
显示全部楼层
没有BKT BENDERA缆车的旅游年....
厉害!!!{:2_79:} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 02:22 PM
|
显示全部楼层
不用等到2月23号 昨天我去都已经暂停了。看到本来是到维修到1月24号,后来又放了一个告示牌,好像是1月25号到29号的。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 03:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
古迹是发展的绊脚石。。。
历史就让他过去吧。。。
我们需要更好的明天。。。
古迹只需要象征式的保留就 ...
swear 发表于 25-1-2010 11:51 AM 
绝对赞同!保留古迹托慢发展脚步。。十年如一日。百年如一年 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 06:05 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 06:23 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:01 PM
|
显示全部楼层
不是不保留,而是不能保留。。。因为完全不能继续用了。。。
一直保留,就会重复相同的故障。。。
而且,上下升旗山,竟要1-2小时的时间(+排队),你认为。。。你身为游客,你愿意等吗???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:02 PM
|
显示全部楼层
不用等到2月23号 昨天我去都已经暂停了。看到本来是到维修到1月24号,后来又放了一个告示牌,好像是1月25号 ...
fishy88 发表于 25-1-2010 02:22 PM 
因为轨道上都堆满了石头。。。林首长因此而不满。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:08 PM
|
显示全部楼层
州政府有尝试去维修了。。。之前不是关过吗??问题还是一样。。。
很多时候报章没有报道,但是缆车经常复生故障。。。你遇过缆车下到半途发生故障,那时候下雨,而且是晚上时间,车上挤满了游客。。。。游客对此的印象会如何???
所以,你认为需要换过新的缆车吗??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
缆车没有消失。只不过要关闭进行大整顿。现在的时常坏。希望新的不会有故障。现在这个已经用了很久。在不更新就危险了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
好心那些所謂的旅游部的專家啊學學太平山的旅游發展計劃
我覺得纜車停駛之后升旗山就沒有意義了 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:14 PM
|
显示全部楼层
lz讲到好像永远消失这样。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
缆车没有消失。只不过要关闭进行大整顿。现在的时常坏。希望新的不会有故障。现在这个已经用了很久。在不更 ...
carljohnson 发表于 25-1-2010 07:12 PM 
是的。。。。发生故障的时候很危险。。。游客被卡在半山。。。如果天色暗的话。。。又没有空调。。。人挤人。。。。唉。。。
很多人都没想过着问题。。。不是因为古迹就一定要保留。。。。最重要的是人们的安全。。。。如果能保留有安全,政府当然不想换的。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 25-1-2010 07:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|