《一起走过艰难的日子》之只益红军楼！

tcguanz

老人家， 不进青训了， 在旁扫地好了

孤独的独行侠

原帖由 tcguanz 于 15-4-2008 12:18 PM 发表
老人家， 不进青训了， 在旁扫地好了

仁兄，比您老的大有人在 ，而且他们也有进青训啊，
至少也放个人资料，让我们更了解您嘛

没看到楼上送哥的内容吗？
您是我们的偶像涅
哪里有偶像，酱神秘的？

tcguanz

回复 219# send 的帖子
为了什么事先？ 表弄到我心慌慌
回复 222# 孤独的独行侠 的帖子
待我先写完一篇稿先， 在报到好了， 反正来日方长

[ 本帖最后由 tcguanz 于 16-4-2008 02:19 PM 编辑 ]

tcguanz

Liverpool coach Ablett delighted with Bruna progress
tribalfootball.com - April 21, 2008

Liverpool reserves coach Gary Ablett is delighted with the progress being made by Argentine youngster Gerardo Bruna.

The midfielder was snapped up from Real Madrid and Ablett told liverpoolfc.tv: "Very pleased. I think Gerardo found it particularly difficult to come in and adapt at first. I think he found the physical nature of English football quite demanding but he's settled down and has got used to it.

"You can see how comfortable he is now, scoring goals like that and he scored an outstanding goal pretty similar to that in Dallas, albeit from the other side of the penalty area. So we know he has the quality to do things like that and you'll see a lot more of Gerardo next year."


Liverpool coach Ablett backing Insua for senior breakthrough
tribalfooball.com - April 21, 2008

Liverpool boss Rafa Benitez is expected to hand Argie youngster Emiliano Insua a Premiership debut before the end of the season.

Asked about the left-back, reserves coach Gary Ablett told liverpoolfc.tv: "I think that's up to Emiliano. He has the ability. He's just got to make sure that mentally he is right and he's prepared. The language can be a bit of a problem at times but he is coming along with his English.

"To answer your question though, he can go as far he wants to go, it's up to him. He has unquestionable ability - we've just got to make sure his mentality and his attitude are right before he goes and plays."


Liverpool coach Ablett backing Pacheco for success
tribalfootball.com - April 21, 2008

Liverpool reserves coach Gary Ablett is pleased with the development of young trio Dani Pacheco, Gerardo Bruna and Daniel Ayala.

Asked about former Barcelona striker Dani, Ablett told liverpoolfc.tv: "Yes he is and he's similar to Gerardo. We've been careful and monitored his football. We felt that we had to with the younger players for fear of causing them damage.

"It was the same with Danny Ayala as well, the three of them were only 16 years of age when they arrived in pre-season, so we had to be patient with them and look after them. But now that we've done that we feel that the time was right to start throwing them in and seeing if they can actually last the 90 minutes.

"Gerardo and Daniel Pacheco would be lucky to last an hour earlier in the season but now we've found that because of the training and the physical routine we've designed for them, their stamina levels have improved and they can now last the 90 minutes like they did against Wigan on Thursday.

利物浦的年青军好像很多可以期待， 特别是Insua;代替Risse

[ 本帖最后由 tcguanz 于 23-4-2008 10:37 AM 编辑 ]

孤独的独行侠

嗯，这要归功于预备队的主帅，Gary Ablett。
现在的预备队实力犹如脱胎换骨般，我们的复兴指日可待。

关于Insua，Ablett说的没错∶

we've just got to make sure his mentality and his attitude are right before he goes and plays.

要循规蹈矩，按部就班，不可操之过急。

tcguanz

So 10 months on from the last year end we finally get to see what the state of the clubs finances were at the time of the takeover. It offers us a mixed bag. The headline figures make rather poor reading however there are some positives to show from them. Whether these positives will continue remain to be seen.

Key Figures

                                                                   2007       2006    % Change
Turnover                                                 133,910   119,499   12%
Cost of Sales                                            16,417   12,803    28.2%
Admin Expenses                                     143,160   117,324   22%
Loss Before Tax                                        21,655    4,931   339%
Net External Debt                                      43,868   25,617    71.2%
Cashflow from Operating Activites             39,996   22,142    80.6%
Gross Transfer Expenditure                      69,972   41,753    67.6%

They make strong reading don’t they? There are reasons behind these set of results. As you all know 2007 was a difficult year for LFC off the pitch. It started with the saga over who would buy the club. And it ended with the saga of who would buy the club. While in between there was the ray of sunshine that came into all our lives of one Mr Fernando Torres (stop bouncing at the back)

Turnover

This is broken down as thus

                             2007     2006     % Change
Media                   52,161   49,753    4.8%
Matchday             38,442   32,654   17.8%
Commercial          41,794   35,559   17.5%
Museum & OSC      1,513     1,533   (1.3%)

As can be seen from above, apart from the Museum & OSC, healthy rises in revenue were enjoyed. The increased Media comes from the advancement to the Final of the European Cup. The matchday turnover increased as a result of 2 extra home games in the european cup knock-out stages compared to the previous season. Commercial increased both as a result of increased bonuses for the final appearance and increased merchandise sales, this was the first year of Adidas supplying the kits/training gear.

Admin Expenses

                                                        2007    2006       % Change
Staff Costs                                            77,589   68,868     12.7%
Amortisation of Players Registrations                  31,121   25,231     23.3%
Impairment on Players Registrations                     2,005    5,250    (61.8%)
Other Operating Charges                                16,991    14,617    16.24%

As a result of the takeover, and the subsequent redesign of the planned new stadium, a couple of exceptional items went through the clubs accounts. The first was a complete writeoff of all costs that were capitalised to the balance sheet with regards to the original stadium design and it’s associated planning permission. This came to £10,323,000. There was also the direct cost of the takeover. There were professional fees of £2,037,000 incurred aswell as a rather sickening bonus of £564,000 (pre-tax) for Rick Parry. This meant that the results stated are distorted by £13m. Had this not taken place the club would have been looking at a loss of approx £8.7m. Still higher than 2006, but entirely manageable in the short term.

Staff costs have increased because of two reasons. One is the general increase due to contract renewals during the period. Players signed on higher contracts than those players departing and also because there is an ongoing legal case on employment taxes and a provision has been made for the potential liabilitiy. This is an unknown but may be related to either the VAT issues that Newcastle were having with the HMRC or it maybe related to similar issues Arsenal were having with regards to tax status of players and where they are registered.

The amortisation of players registrations increased as a result of increased investment in playing staff, while the impairment charge relates to a writedown of the value of Gabriel Palleta prior to his transfer out of the club.

There was also an amount of £3.8m capitalised to the balance sheet relating to the revised stadium designs.

Net Debt

This increased markedly over the year. This was a result of the increased levels of capital expenditure in the reporting period. £54.4m of net capital expenditure occurred while there was only £40m of operating cashflows to pay for it. The £54.4m is made up of £46.1m outflow for transfer fees and £8.3m of expenditure to purchase fixed assets (likely to relate to land purchases and expenditure on the 2nd set of stadium designs).

There was also an intercompany loan made from Kop Football (Holdings) Limited to LFC. This was used to repay the loan obtained from David Moores for the purchase of Dirk Kuyt.

After the year end LFC received funds totalling £51.7m to repay existing due borrowings and to provide working capital. This is likely to be in the form of a loan but it has an advantage of clearing the clubs rather sizeable overdraft (£37.7m). Kop Football (Holdings) Limited also paid, on behalf of LFC, £1.3m in relation to the new stadium.

There is also upto £35m outstanding on transfer fees to other clubs. This is predominantly to european clubs and likely relate to the transfers of Torres and Babel.

Contingent Assets/Liabilities

If certain conditions are met the club has potential income of £8.6m and potential expenditure of £7.4m on transfer fees.

Transfer Expenditure

The one area that causes the biggest debate. Every year we have fans complaining about the amount of money spent on players and every year they get it wrong, massively. These are the true figures for the last 3 financial years.

(figures in £000s)
Financial Year Ending       2007      2006       2005
Purchases                     69,972    41,753    46,106
Sales                           25,946     16,838    13,162
Net Transfer Activity      44,026      24,915   32,944

Note, 2007’s Figures include the Dirk Kuyt transfer which took place in August 2006 and came to approx £10m.

Since the end of the financial year Javier Mascherano Martin Skrtel, Sebastian Leto, Charles Itandje, Emiliano Insua and Damien Plessis have been brought into the club on a permanent basis. All of this excluding Javier Mascherano resulted in transfer fees payable of £10.9m. Add in Mascherano at an estimated minimum of £10m gives a gross outlay of £20.9m since the 31 July 2007. Also Momo Sissoko and Palleta have both left the club, Palleta for £0.5m and Sissoko for a reported £9m. Leaving net spending at approx £11.4m since 31 July 2007.

只是上篇

[ 本帖最后由 tcguanz 于 29-5-2008 04:25 PM 编辑 ]

tcguanz

The Immediate Future

The immediate future is now difficult to predict, will we be sold again or won’t we. Will the stadium go ahead or not, can the club afford the debt repayments it may be asked to pay? So many questions so little answers. There is only a limited area of certainty.

1) The latest Premier League tv deal. This will increase league media revenues by approx £15m, as a result the club is looking at breaking the £150m turnover mark this current financial year.

2) The increased sponsorship revenue from Carlsberg which adds around £2m a season to existing revenues.

3) The supporter pet hate, increased ticket prices. These will generate approx £2m to £3m a season to revenues.

4) This financial year there won’t be the large £10.3m exceptional writeoff, nor will there be the takeover costs (unless something happens in the next 10 weeks)

These 4 items alone generate a swing of approx £30m in profit, although interest costs and any increased staff costs will not be known for a year.

From midway this latest financial year LFC also took complete control of LFC.tv Limited. This will double the share of turnover/profit generated from it’s activities.

Benchmarking against our rivals

This time I thought I would do a benchmark against our 3 main rivals at the top, Chelsea, Man Utd and Arsenal. I do this because this is another area of mass debate, and low knowledge, to beat the Moores/Parry regime. With this I aim to show how the top 4 compare in the revenue, core costs (player amortisation and wages) and transfer expenditure stakes.

The figures relate to the season 2006/07 and are taken from the published accounts of all 4 clubs. There is a slight difference in accounting reference dates but I believe these are insignificant. The figures also relate to footballing activity only (arsenal have a property development going on at present, chelsea have the hotel etc)

(in £000s unless stated)
                                               Liverpool  Man Utd  Chelsea   Arsenal
Turnover                                    133,910  210,081   177,109  176,507
Media                                          52,161   61,484    Not Avail 44,312
Matchday                                     38,442   92,562   Not Avail  90,613
Commercial                                   41,794   56,035   Not Avail 41,582
Amortisation of Player Registrations   33,126   24,252    69,968   18,782
Staff Wages                                  77,589   91,588    122,779 89,703
Staff Wages as % of Turnover           57.9%   43.6%     69.3%   50.8%
Gross Transfer Expenditure               69,972   78,998    26,802   17,585
Net Transfer Expenditure                  44,026   61,718    5,202   (1,569)

As you can see matchday revenue is what I consider the most glaring difference between our performance and that of Arsenal and Manchester United (unfortunately Chelsea didn’t do a segmental report on turnover). We are currently in excess of £50m behind in turnover from matchday revenues. That is a hell of a way to be behind and it is because of one factor. Anfield. It is too small and too poorly equiped for corporates to generate the sort of revnues Arsenal and Manchester United make. It is why a new stadium, from a financial point of view, is a must. The other areas are relatively insignificant. The media is down to positions in the league, the higher you are the more money you get. This then feeds through to the tv money received from UEFA.

Our commercial v that of Uniteds stems from an approx £4m difference in kit sponsorhip value and the shirt sponsorship being around £9m below that of Uniteds at the time.

Comparing against Arsenal shows we lack only in matchday revenues, while commercial activity is slightly distorted from Arsenal due to the £3m a year they get for stadium sponsorship that neither us nor Chelsea/Man Utd get.

You will also see that we only trailed Manchester United in both Gross and Net Transfer Expenditure in the financial year.

© Tim Moore

对利物浦财政有兴趣的请看

tcguanz

Matthaus: Liverpool's Torres can be superstar
tribalfooball.com - June 05, 2008

German legend Lothar Matthaus admits he's a big fan of Liverpool ace Fernando Torres.

Click Here!
Matthaus said: "He is a man who has dislodged a popular hero like Real Madrid's Raul and scored goals at will with Atletico and Liverpool, despite the burden of a 35million euros transfer fee.

"A lad like that must have class. It is very hard to be better than Raul. Torres is that.

"He is a player like Stuttgart's Mario Gomez, only more effective. The blond Spaniard is very strong in the air, makes effective runs, turns in an instant, has a fantastic shooting technique and is also dangerous with his left foot.

"He can become a superstar at the European Championships."

我还以为只有我一人认为GOmez跟TOrres是同等类型的射脚， 没想到还有人和我一样想法
GOmez千万不要给Arsenal买去

tcguanz

Torres explains why he's simply the best
by Jade Lauriston, 05 June 2008

   
Liverpool striker Fernando Torres has revealed his secret behind his ability to score so many goals, it is down to the ineptness of Premier League defenders and goalkeepers.

The Spanish star, who signed for The Reds last summer in a £21.5 million deal from Atletico Madrid, feels that he is able to run rings around Premier League keepers due to their style of play for coming out for the ball too early.

As he prepares for Euro 2008, Torres has discussed why he feels he is such a success in The Premier League.

“In England the keepers usually come out too soon and try to go one on one with you," Torres told The Sun.

"The only exceptions are Edwin Van der Sar and Petr Cech, who hold and hold and try to keep themselves ‘big’ as you close in on them. #

"That’s why, against Manchester United and Chelsea, I try to hit the ball early. The rest of the Premier keepers tend to come out at you and throw themselves down at the ball too quickly."

Torres feels that English defenders rely too much on their physical superiority and presence, and do not concentrate on keeping their defensive position.

“In general, that’s the reason so many goals in England are scored when a striker dribbles right or left and the keeper goes down at his feet. But if you anticipate what’s coming, it’s easier to score," Torres added.

"The central defenders are usually big, strong, aggressive lads. I guess it is probably because of these characteristics that the majority think they can solve problems by getting tough with me.

"But the truth is most of them lack defensive positioning as a result of their reliance on strength and aggression and leave so much space for you to take advantage of."

It seems that having a Spanish goalkeeping coach instructing him at Liverpool has provided Torres with an invaluable insight into the domestic game, and understanding how the goalkeepers and defenders read the game.

“We’ve a Spanish goalkeeping coach and he has been a genius at telling me every week exactly what kind of task lies in front of me in the following match. Nobody has ever worked with me like this before. It’s outstanding.

"Basically, I know days before the next game exactly the best way to finish a chance against the keeper I’m about to face," he said.

“Xavi Valero tells me precisely what each keeper tends to do — stay big, go down early, if they have a preferred side they try to push you to. It’s vital information.

"I’ve refined the way I take chances as a result."

他把自己的秘密说了出来， 下个赛季进不到球？:p

tcguanz

虽然EURO小组赛还没踢完， 但是这一届的欧冠的确很好看。
原因：
1. 大多国家家会比较崇尚进攻足球
2. 进攻足球在这一届的进球例比较高， 而想以防守突击的队伍往往不能胜利甚至输了比赛。 笔数0-0是很少见的。
在这一届的欧洲杯打法最漂亮的几队：
1. 葡萄牙--个人技术进攻强， 但打法比巴西还要好看， 因为他们在于体质对抗和团体合作方面都比较好。
2. 荷兰--多点进攻， 防不胜防。 禁区里有Nisteroy， 边锋有Robben， Play maker有Van da Vaart及Sneijder， 头球和跑不死的有Kuyt， 尖锐的攻击有Van Per Sie 强中之强
3. 西班牙--短传漂亮， 节奏快速， 三队中虽然后防最大漏洞， 但是前锋超强， Torres 及Villa都是可以将一个机会转为进球的人。 堪称本赛季的超强前锋。

为什么我会提到这次的Euro杯呢？ 因为这次的杯赛很明显的表示一样东西。 Mourinho及Rafa爱用的防守足球已经慢慢被淘汰了。 现在是技术+体能+进攻球员的天下。 次级的队伍如Croatia、Romania等都有护球和传球技术很好的球员。 我想这应该是一个很强的预兆， 强烈的暗示着利物浦， 如果下个赛季进攻不再漂亮点火力不再强点， 恐怕冠军梦还是一场空。 当然， 我们都知道现在Villa和利物浦连在一起的传闻都很紧， 但实话一句， 我们对于自己的两只”老狐狸“Tauke都心知肚明， 99% 是不会花这么一大笔钱来买Villa的， 不过就像我常常去买6/52般， 有一个白日梦发发还不错， 哪里知道真的有一天梦会成真呢！

利物浦最近几乎和无数的球星都扯上了不少绯闻
要走的有
Crouch--老板叫Rafa10 Mil卖了
Alonso-- 卖去Juventus 14 Mil（听说Mourinho会去Inter， Ravenalli最好跟利物浦买多一点人， 报回上次无辜被炒之仇 ）
Risse--Roma说要， 但是说5 Mil太贵
Guthrie-- Bolton要买
Finnnan--Fulham及Villa要
其他人就不知道了

买进了两人
Dossenna--没看过他踢， 听说不错， 但利物浦很多球星还没进来是都不错的， 只有在过了一个赛季才知道他是个废才
Degen--本来想在Euro看他踢球， 但是没出场机会？！

被传会被利物浦买进的球员
Barry-Aston Villa的灵魂人物， Villa死都不肯放手
Downing-- 两年前Middesborugh的灵魂人物， 现在地位大不如前
Milner-- Newcastle新人， 很努力但是技术不够
Bentley--阿申纳的弃将， 在BlackBurn从新建立起声望。 有着代替Beckham的野心。
Villa--在西班牙和Torres成为绝配的前锋， 但是在一个鞋子戏法总和四粒进球后， 成为这届金靴奖的得主的声望很高， 价钱可能会被提到更高。 尤其是当有Chelsea这样花钱如水的球会在市场时。

这么多好的球星跟利物浦扯上关系是一种荣幸， 但是每次看到流口水， 是多么叫人拍胸叫痛的事。
P/s我看好的Gomez差劲到够力， 看来他的身价会大跌了

[ 本帖最后由 tcguanz 于 17-6-2008 05:53 PM 编辑 ]

tcguanz

只益红军楼！
FML（Fottball manager live）测试还可以再邀二人。
有兴趣快PM我， 先到先得

依然范特西

原帖由 tcguanz 于 21-6-2008 08:27 PM 发表
只益红军楼！
FML（Fottball manager live）测试还可以再邀二人。
有兴趣快PM我， 先到先得

正式版开始了才告诉我