|
查看: 3115|回复: 59
|
柔佛蘇丹不滿新的RTS彎橋，要求直橋，馬勞同意嗎？
[复制链接]
|
|
|
http://www.todayonline.com/world ... -board-sultan-johor
Singapore-Johor Rapid Transit System design needs to ‘go back to the drawing board’: Sultan of Johor
MERSING — The Sultan of Johor has serious reservations on the proposed design of the Rapid Transit System (RTS) rail track, including an elevated bridge, linking Woodlands in Singapore to Bukit Chagar, Johor Baru.
In an exclusive interview with the New Straits Times Press Group, Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar said while he welcomed the project, he disagreed with the overall curve-shaped design of the track, as well the plan to build the bridge as high as 30m above water in the middle section.
The bridge, he said, would disrupt the city skyline along the Johor Straits.
“It disrupts the city skyline, and we are talking about a permanent fixture here. Go back to the drawing board and review the overall plan.
“The parties also have to consult me. Whatever (new plan) is presented to me, it will have to be logical, economical and sustainable for the benefit of not only Johoreans but all Malaysians and Singaporeans,” he said.
Sultan Ibrahim said the proposed curved design of the rail link as well as the elevated bridge was impractical, unsustainable and potentially costly.
“Why do we have to have a curved design when we can have a more practical design that is straighter and closer to the Causeway?
“Why do they need an elevated bridge with up to 30m air draft (clearance height from water to a vessel’s height) unless there are plans to remove the Causeway?
“I am proposing that the design be aligned as such for practicality and it will cost less,” he said.
During the interview, Sultan Ibrahim also sketched a design he felt was more practical than the one proposed.
“The design matters to us and by ‘us’, I mean Johor.”
The new design, he said, could be the same height as the Causeway or be slightly elevated.
柔佛蘇丹不滿新的RTS彎橋，要求直橋！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 12:30 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 12:33 PM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
zomok老李要拆故居沒有請小李去討論嗎？
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 12:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
妈的， 马国人谈判时要派个有决定权的人。不要决定了， 还有一堆莫名其妙的人跑来指指点点。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 01:22 PM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 01:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
做这条桥在他的地方做，但是都是纳吉的人在分，他的人什么都没有分，当然不高兴啦，当然要讲啦，等budget再做贵来分给他的人后，不就乖乖收声了咯。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 8-8-2017 02:07 PM
|
显示全部楼层
kcchiew 发表于 8-8-2017 12:30 PM
去年双方已经有讨论了，要隧道，低桥还是高桥？
最后选高桥。
那时没请苏丹去讨论吗？
https://wmaproperty.com/blog/high-bridge-under-johor-bahru-singapore-rts-to-be-finalised-in-2017/
...
有人記得這個嗎？
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 02:13 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 8-8-2017 02:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 02:20 PM
|
显示全部楼层
高桥据说是最经济便宜的选项，如果苏丹要付钱（包括维修）的话，就算建隧道两国应该也会同意的。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 8-8-2017 02:25 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 02:46 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 8-8-2017 02:58 PM 编辑
老大，当年新加坡反对，是因为会动到那些输水管，不是不让船经过。
现在要这么建，我猜是为了要越过现有地上的设施，可能包括新山的公主湾公寓(部份）和新山关卡。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 02:49 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 8-8-2017 02:53 PM 编辑
忽然想到，为何苏丹会反对。
因为新山的关卡名字是Sultan Iskandar，怎么可以有地铁能从他（或他老爸）头上跨过？
（补充：是他老爸。）
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 02:54 PM
|
显示全部楼层
馬來西亞都填掉自己的那一半了，還要再提什麼大船經過，別再莫名其妙了!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 8-8-2017 02:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 03:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 04:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
快点建，建好，过桥不用塞车
要不然每次驾车回都要塞 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 05:36 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 06:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
高桥比较有远见,以后拆掉大桥可以让游艇过,可以增加很多游玩的景点,也不必到了以后又来造新桥... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 8-8-2017 06:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
变色卡
千斤顶
1770 
373
